• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hunter & Joe Biden's Suspicious Activities? Investigation into influence pedding updated 7/31/23

Updated July 31 2023:



Five most significant allegations against the Bidens in FBI FD-1023 form:​


1) "Both" Joe and Hunter Biden advised Burisma CEO to keep Hunter on the board

But Zlochevsky told the source that he "needed to keep Hunter Biden [on the board] ‘so everything will be okay.'" The source went on to ask "whether Hunter Biden or Joe Biden told Zlochevsky he should retain Hunter." "Zlochevsky replied: ‘They both did,’" the document said.

The source reiterated that this was a "mistake," and that Zlochevsky "should fire Hunter Biden and deal with Shokin’s investigation directly so that the matter" would stay an issue in Ukraine and so that it would not "turn into some international matter," to which Zlochevsky stressed not to worry and said that "this thing will go away anyway."

2) Hunter said he would help end criminal investigation into Burisma "through his dad"

Zlochevsky said that Burisma had "hired Hunter Biden ‘to protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems.’"

3) The Bidens ‘pushed’ Burisma CEO Zlochevsky to pay them

CHS asked Zlochevsky whether he was concerned about Burisma’s involvement with the Bidens," the form states. "Zlochevsky stated he didn't want to pay the Bidens and he was ‘pushed to pay’ them."

4) Burisma CEO did not pay 'the Big Guy' directly

The form says that the confidential source asked Zlochevsky how many companies and bank accounts he controlled, to which he responded that it would "take them (investigators) 10 years to find the records (i.e., illicit payments to Joe Biden)."

5) Burisma CEO has audio recordings, text messages, wire transfer statements as ‘proof’ of arrangement

The source said that Zlochevsky said he had "a total of 17 recordings" involving the Bidens; "two of the recordings included Joe Biden, and the remaining 15 recordings only included Hunter Biden."

The source said that those recordings "evidence Zlochevsky was somehow coerced into paying the Bidens to ensure" that Shokin would be fired.

____________

Here is the original OP from July 2022. Since then Hunter has pled guilty to tax evasion and gun charges:


Rep. James Comer told Newsmax on Thursday that if the Republicans regain control of the House in November, they are ''going to see what led to'' U.S. banks issuing ''150 suspicious activity reports'' for Hunter Biden's business transactions. ''These were put into place by George W. Bush after September 11th to try to catch money laundering and try to catch people who are funneling money from foreign countries into American domestic terrorist sales,'' the Kentucky Republican said on ''Spicer & Co.'' ''So this is a very serious violation. He had 150 of these. It's not a far-fetched theory to say that Hunter Biden had more suspicious activity reports than any human in American history.''

''Under the Obama administration and the Bush administration, any member of Congress, not just someone on the Oversight Committee, but any member of Congress could request the suspicious activity reports from the Treasury and they would provide those within three days,'' Comer said. ''But Biden, for whatever reason, and I think we know the reason, halted that and now says no member of Congress can get these suspicious activity reports.'


Anyone can trigger a SAR, simply by depositing $10,000 or more in cash at a bank, which is not hard to do since $10k is not a lot of money these days.

According to this article, Biden has restricted access to SARs, but the banks say they wont supply them w/o a subpoena.
 
Last edited:




Anyone can trigger a SAR, simply by depositing $10,000 or more in cash at a bank, which is not hard to do since $10k is not a lot of money these days.

Biden is the first president disallow Congress from requesting SARs from the Treasury Department to protect Hunter Biden's dirty dealings with foreign nationals, etc.
1) newsmax? bahjahahhaha
2) do you have any evidence it was motivated by his sons' dealings?
3) do you have any evidence his son has been involved in illegal business activity?
 




Anyone can trigger a SAR, simply by depositing $10,000 or more in cash at a bank, which is not hard to do since $10k is not a lot of money these days.

Biden is the first president disallow Congress from requesting SARs from the Treasury Department to protect Hunter Biden's dirty dealings with foreign nationals, etc.
Oh Hello there Roe Wade, did not see you come in good sir.
 
The SEC and banks say they LEGALLY need a subpoena to release the information.

The GOP can't get one. To get a subpoena one needs probable cause OR a majority in congress. The GOP has neither.

This isn't a conspiracy to cover up anything, this is how privacy laws work.

Oh, wait, Newsmax didn't tell you that part did they?

Oops
 
The SEC and banks say they LEGALLY need a subpoena to release the information.

The GOP can't get one. To get a subpoena one needs probable cause OR a majority in congress. The GOP has neither.

This isn't a conspiracy to cover up anything, this is how privacy laws work.

Oh, wait, Newsmax didn't tell you that part did they?

Oops

And I will add this: It is absolutely shocking how the GOP wants to use the power of the government to pursue political vendettas.

Every Conservative Accusation is a Confession.
 
And the punchline?

This fits right into the theme of the current thread about the IRS being used by the GOP to target political enemies.

I mean, come on.

Every Conservative Accusation is a Confession.

BTW, the thread title is a complete lie. Biden is not blocking anything. The GOP is simply unable to get subpoenas because of no probable cause.
 
Last edited:
The SEC and banks say they LEGALLY need a subpoena to release the information.

The GOP can't get one. To get a subpoena one needs probable cause OR a majority in congress. The GOP has neither.

This isn't a conspiracy to cover up anything, this is how privacy laws work.

Oh, wait, Newsmax didn't tell you that part did they?

Oops


You may have a point about the subpoena, according to this article:


"'The banks have also indicated that they cannot provide information without a subpoena, and we know Democrats aren't interested in conducting oversight of this potential national security threat. When Republicans take back the House, we'll use the gavel to get answers,' Comer said in a statement to CBS News."
 
And the punchline?

This fits right into the theme of the current thread about the IRS being used by the GOP to target political enemies.

I mean, come on.

Every Conservative Accusation is a Confession.

BTW, the thread title is a complete lie. Biden is not blocking anything. The GOP is simply unable to get subpoenas because of no probable cause.

Title updated.
 
You may have a point about the subpoena, according to this article:


"'The banks have also indicated that they cannot provide information without a subpoena, and we know Democrats aren't interested in conducting oversight of this potential national security threat. When Republicans take back the House, we'll use the gavel to get answers,' Comer said in a statement to CBS News."

The fact that they cannot get a subpoena through the courts tells you ALL you need to know.

This is a political witch hunt.

There is NO legal probable cause here.

Wake the fuck up, man.
 
Back
Top