kage69
Lifer
- Jul 17, 2003
- 31,728
- 48,544
- 136
yada yada just triple down on chauvinism, and blame others for being lazy. 🤣
Logically, if Chinese quality is utter shit, you wouldn't even need to protect against it. Because it would fail on its own.
Don't get me wrong, parts of their vast manufacturing benefit from state subsidies, which gives them an unfair pricing advantage vs western competition. For that reason, targeted tariffs does make some sense. They're indeed well known for IP theft and industrial espionage.
Glad you bring up Russia; outside of petroleum products and mail-order brides, they have absolutely nothing we want to buy. Ergo besides sanctions due to their illegal invasion of Ukraine, we don't have to target any of their industries in any way, shape or form. Yet for some reasons, we are deeply concerned about China's growing economic and military capabilities. 🤔
Finally, WSJ reports that despite export controls tying one hand behind their backs, SMIC is a capable foundry that is strategically important for China. I guess WSJ must be lazy as well.
Hey if the shoe fits. Your reply makes me suspect you don't understand what the term "triples down" means. Also that I hit a nerve. Do we have another CCP fan taking things personally? Tsk tsk.
Logically, I can't believe (all) Chinese quality is utter shit if I've already submitted, and I quote, "Good quality is possible, but it's usually an exception rather than a rule." Plenty of Chinese tech giants have gone under, where have you been? You mean fail like UNIGROUP? Or you mean fail like Xiangdixian? Go look up how many Chinese tech companies went under in 2023 and get back to us. You are basically crowing because China was able to stay afloat by smuggling western tech around sanctions. Where would they be without Nvidia?
The Russian military largely thinks Chinese stuff is junk, I'm sorry you and others are having such a difficult time reconciling that with the topic and claims of chauvenism. Unfortunately absolutely nothing about my post was related to the Russian economy or natural resources. You aren't arguing what you think you are. I did notice you didn't even attempt to answer my challenges regarding Japan and Korea, avoided my mention of other industries like budget Chinese meat.
"Yet for some reasons..."
lol, yikes. Your dismissive attitude towards a very real and looming threat to peace in Asia makes me think I'm wasting my time responding to you. Yeah, you should probably ignore my posts moving forward.
