poofyhairguy
Lifer
- Nov 20, 2005
- 14,612
- 318
- 126
I'm just not seeing many scenarios where two extra cores help out.
Two words: Live Wallpaper
I'm just not seeing many scenarios where two extra cores help out.
Exactly. Under 2ms to switch between the low power core and general purpose cores. My phone draws ~5mAh, this will save a lot more, to compensate for battery draw under load.Tegra 3 should be able to dynamically turn on and off cores. It also has a 5th core for low power mode. Battery life should be pretty good with the chip despite it having 5 cores. Which is something HTC is not known, long battery life![]()
Tegra 3 should be able to dynamically turn on and off cores. It also has a 5th core for low power mode. Battery life should be pretty good with the chip despite it having 5 cores. Which is something HTC is not known, long battery life![]()
Two words: Live Wallpaper
They'll probably use this as an excuse to reduce battery size to 1000mah...Tegra 3 should be able to dynamically turn on and off cores. It also has a 5th core for low power mode. Battery life should be pretty good with the chip despite it having 5 cores. Which is something HTC is not known, long battery life![]()
If it's that processor intensive, why would anyone want to run such an awful battery vampire?
They generally aren't and they dont unduly hit your battery even with a fairly weak phone.
They generally aren't and they dont unduly hit your battery even with a fairly weak phone.
Waits for someone to find some stupidly CPU intensive live wallpaper
Then I suppose we should ask Poofy why this is a use case for two additional cores.
Nvidia is going quad-core because it sounds nice.
Same here. I am not really interested in Tegra3 devices, rather in the impact on market and "shaking up the ARM SoC game" as you put it. Nvidia is about to squeeze the last drop out of the A9 Cortex core (if they don't, OMAP4470 surely will) so others will have to reach for A15 parts.It is a way to shake up the ARM SoC game, and I like it.
I was mostly joking (sometimes it would be nice to have a throw-away core to run some of the prettier and more CPU intensive Live Wallpapers though).
Nvidia is going quad-core because it sounds nice. It is a way to shake up the ARM SoC game, and I like it.
Screen is too big for most, including me. 4"-4.3" is the ideal size for a "big" smartphone. This is an HTC phone, so I'm expecting the battery life to suck because of (Non)Sense.
I don't get it, why does HTC keep spitting up design after design. They had a sexy design with the HD1, they should just re-release that but with some refinements. All their new phones are meh.
Put that in your signature so you don't have to troll threads about phones you don't have the slightest intention of even considering.
Who cares about what you owned, your personal device history is completely irrelevant.Taking things a bit personal there buddy? I like the HD1 design and I don't like the current HTC phone designs. I originally owned the EVO 4G, which closely resembles the HD1.
Same was said about dual core phones. Like it or not, take a look at roadmaps. Qualcomm's S4(late 2012 models), TI's OMAP5, Apple's A6 and Samsung's Exynos 5250, all quad core SoC's.Why would anyone needs a quad core on a mobile device. Overkill.
Why would anyone needs a quad core on a mobile device. Overkill.
Who cares about what you owned, your personal device history is completely irrelevant.
What are people going to use quad cores for?
Like most of what everyone has said, it is overkill.
