Originally posted by: monzi
If someone filled my house up with empty bags of air.....I would laugh, not have them arrested. Thats just silly. ITS A PRANK--be thankful they didnt faak up the school, or do stupid stuff like grafitti.
-Monzi
Originally posted by: neonerd
If you pull this prank the day after you attend the graduation ceremony, and recieve your diploma, can they do anything to you? (other than call the cops)
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
they still got to graduate, they just didn't get to walk in the ceremony. i think the punishment fits the crime.
Originally posted by: broon
If you're going to risk a prank you need to be willing to suffer the consequences if caught. Last I heard breaking and entering is a crime.
Originally posted by: myusername
Originally posted by: DrPizza
As I informed my students, nobody loves a good practical joke more than me...
but (again)
1. Can't break the law, that includes breaking into places..
2. Can't harm or risk harm to anyone, including emotional harm
3. Has to be creative; a bucket of water falling from a door is NOT creative
4. Can't cause someone a hardship, such as having to clean up some sort of mess.
edit: while they broke rule #1, I still think the school over-reacted.
The law they broke was disorderly conduct, which refers only to the fact that they were playing a practical joke at all - not the nature of the joke or when/where/how it was played.
If this example does not pass your qualifications for #1, Dr. Pizza, then you need to revise your criteria and explain to your students that you simply do not approve of any kind of practical jokes/senior pranks. period.
Legal Dictionary
dis·or·der·ly con·duct
n.
Conduct that is likely to lead to a disturbance of the public peace or that offends public decency; also The petty offense of engaging in disorderly conduct compare breach of the peace
- The term disorderly conduct is used in statutes to identify various acts against the public peace. It has been held to include the use of obscene language in public, the blocking of public ways, and the making of threats. A statute must identify acts that constitute disorderly conduct with sufficient clarity in order to avoid being held unconstitutional because of vagueness.