• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

HP Cameras to come with 'in camera slimming feature' take off 10 lbs . . . ummm ok

wow...i sure as hell hope this doesnt get big...that just looks like a stupid gimic to me, but I guess I wouldnt be surprised if it gets popular...
 
Canon, Pentax, and Nikon are working on things like in-camera IS, dust-off vibration, greater dynamic range, etc.

HP is working on.... *smacks forehead*
 
Originally posted by: fuzzybabybunny
Canon, Pentax, and Nikon are working on things like in-camera IS, dust-off vibration, greater dynamic range, etc.

HP is working on.... *smacks forehead*
Click to expand...

My thoughts exactly.
 
Originally posted by: fuzzybabybunny
Canon, Pentax, and Nikon are working on things like in-camera IS, dust-off vibration, greater dynamic range, etc.

HP is working on.... *smacks forehead*
Click to expand...



This is America, most people have no idea what dynamic range, or dust off vibration is. Most people do have 10-300 pounds they could lose though.
 
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Originally posted by: fuzzybabybunny
Canon, Pentax, and Nikon are working on things like in-camera IS, dust-off vibration, greater dynamic range, etc.

HP is working on.... *smacks forehead*
Click to expand...

Pentax actually already had the slimming effect feature a while ago 😉

http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/35mm/k100d/feature.html
Scroll down for slim feature
Click to expand...

Haha, so HP's idea isn't even original. I'm not saying the feature's worthless, just that I think manufacturors should work on other, more important things before going the, uh, slim filter route, which Pentax seems to have done.
 
They are marketing to an increasingly over weight world (yes world, not just the US).

And marketing to people's desires and insecurities works.

I say it's brilliant. Sad, but brilliant.
 
Originally posted by: fuzzybabybunny
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Originally posted by: fuzzybabybunny
Canon, Pentax, and Nikon are working on things like in-camera IS, dust-off vibration, greater dynamic range, etc.

HP is working on.... *smacks forehead*
Click to expand...

Pentax actually already had the slimming effect feature a while ago 😉

http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/35mm/k100d/feature.html
Scroll down for slim feature
Click to expand...

Haha, so HP's idea isn't even original. I'm not saying the feature's worthless, just that I think manufacturors should work on other, more important things before going the, uh, slim filter route, which Pentax seems to have done.
Click to expand...

Well from a features point of view it's a relatively low cost feature, just a small software change to implement.
 
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Originally posted by: fuzzybabybunny
Canon, Pentax, and Nikon are working on things like in-camera IS, dust-off vibration, greater dynamic range, etc.

HP is working on.... *smacks forehead*
Click to expand...



This is America, most people have no idea what dynamic range, or dust off vibration is. Most people do have 10-300 pounds they could lose though.
Click to expand...

Care to define them for those of us wo would like to find out?
 
Originally posted by: Shawn
So basically it just makes the picture narrower?
Click to expand...

and they charge you like crazy for that😀

think of how much you'll save now that you won't have to deal with those pesky gym memberships😀
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top