Howard Dean wants you to use 'smart ID' to log-in to you PC/MAC

[Leon]

ZDNet piece

Dean also suggested that computer makers such as Apple Computer, Dell, Gateway and Sony should be required to include an ID card reader in PCs--and Americans would have to insert their uniform IDs into the reader before they could log on. "One state's smart-card driver's license must be identifiable by another state's card reader," Dean said. "It must also be easily commercialized by the private sector and included in all PCs over time--making the Internet safer and more secure."

Wonderful

 

[Vic]

Jeez... combine that with his call for Greenspan's ouster last week, and it seems that Dean has successfully suicided his political career.

Good riddance.

 

[Genesys]

hmmm, BUSH ISNT THE ANTICHRIST ANYMORE, ITS DEAN!!!!!!!!!!

 

[burnedout]

So long, Howard.....

 

[lozina]

I guess Dean figures since he's already shoulder high in quicksand, going a little deeper won't impact his chances much.

 

[Dissipate]

That's the most inane proposal I have read in awhile. Now people have to have cards swiped in their computer to log on to the Internet? Bogus!

 

[Czar]

no wonder he is loosing support

 

[alchemize]

/me waits for MonstaThrilla to come explain away the latest gaffes...

The Greenspan one was the bigger, but nobody will notice except people with 401(k)'s

 

[CADsortaGUY]

dave posted some info on this in the other thread about this.

I guess I should have made the title more searchable.

CkG

 

[Dari]

Howard the Duck was never a contender to begin with. Let's face it folks, you lie with dogs you're going to wake up with fleas. Dean got support from the extreme left of the democratic party, and people thought he was a serious candidate? I bet all those donators want their money back, right? Lol. Sorry folks, it's going to be siphoned off for the Big Bong Bash the pinkos were planning, win or lose.

 

[XMan]

That's pretty insane considering most of the buzz about Dean and his campaign contributions came from tech saavy people.

 

[glugglug]

wow. I expect this from the neocons but from other parties, ack! So have the libertarians chosen a candidate yet?

 

[digitalsm]

Originally posted by: glugglug
wow. I expect this from the neocons but from other parties, ack! So have the libertarians chosen a candidate yet?

I dont know if you bashed Bush over his immigration policy. But Im assuming you didnt since you mentioned libertarians. If you dont like Bush's plan to give guest worker status, and eventually citizenship to illegals, the libertarian party isnt for you, considering their stance of immigration. Ive seen alot of people mention the libertarians, but they've also bitched about Bush's immigration policy.

What Im trying to say is, Ive seen some on this board who really dont have a clue as to where the Libertarians stand on issues. Im not saying you are one of them though.

 

[Moonbeam]

You are only a number. Crime =happens because people are anonymous. This must end. Nothing to fear when every step is accounted fore. The end of crime.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Leon
ZDNet piece

Dean also suggested that computer makers such as Apple Computer, Dell, Gateway and Sony should be required to include an ID card reader in PCs--and Americans would have to insert their uniform IDs into the reader before they could log on. "One state's smart-card driver's license must be identifiable by another state's card reader," Dean said. "It must also be easily commercialized by the private sector and included in all PCs over time--making the Internet safer and more secure."

Wonderful

Brilliant!

 

[Red Dawn]

dp

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Dean was born on internet.
Dean died on internet.
So long Howard "Wall Street" Dean! Corporations want to control you, so do their candidates. Now what about "Forbes" Kerry?
And hello Dennis Kucinich, the only candidate who actually voted against the Patriot Act, the only candidate you really can trust on this fundamental issue...that is, if you care about the US Constitution like Kucinich does.
By the way, did you hear the State of the Union? Bush said he was going to extend Patriot Act. Patriot Act II: the termination of the US Constitution. This is why you had better support the only candidate who proved he will destroy the Patriot Act and save the Constitution. The other candidates only made promises on the campaign trail that totally contradict their votes in favour of the Patriot Act. If you remember Clinton, it should be clear to you that promises during the campaign are worthless. The only thing that matters is the past votes of the candidates on crucial issues like the Patriot Act and the war, to know where these comedians really stand.

 

[glugglug]

The problem with Kucinich is he doesn't stand a chance. In the extremely unlikely event that he made it past the primaries, or even became a front-runner, you'd see his past brought up every day. 2 divorces and Cleveland went bankrupt while he was mayor.

While I think he may be the best candidate left for the job, he stands no chance.

 

[Flyermax2k3]

Originally posted by: Genesys
hmmm, BUSH ISNT THE ANTICHRIST ANYMORE, ITS DEAN!!!!!!!!!!

Perhaps They're all antichrist though, so it's hard to say who the true Antichrist is.

 

[burnedout]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw
Dean was born on internet.
Dean died on internet...

Oh, the irony of it all....

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: glugglug
The problem with Kucinich is he doesn't stand a chance. In the extremely unlikely event that he made it past the primaries, or even became a front-runner, you'd see his past brought up every day. 2 divorces and Cleveland went bankrupt while he was mayor.

While I think he may be the best candidate left for the job, he stands no chance.

Many people, including Michael Moore, say he is the best but do not campaign for him using the excuse that other candidates are more popular. But these other candidates are more popular because, as in the case of Dean who got the cover of Newsweek and Time the same week, they get much more publicity from the corporate media which dislike Kucinich because he has always fought the corporations. It should motivate every democratic voter to spend ten times more energy supporting Kucinich. Just read the story of who he really is! =>

Dennis Kucinich, integrity, and the Northeast Blackout

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/

Dennis Kucinich Gets a Well-Deserved Payback for Integrity from the Northeast Blackout

© Copyright 2003, From The Wilderness Publications, http://www.copvcia.com . All Rights Reserved. May be reprinted, distributed or posted on an Internet web site for non-profit purposes only.

[August 21, 2003, 2350 PDT, (FTW) -- Although FTW will not endorse any Presidential candidate who does not address all the issues of Peak Oil and Gas, Bush Administration Complicity in 9/11, Trillions of Dollars Stolen from the US Treasury, and criminal misrepresentation of Iraqi intelligence before the US invasion, we do like to give praise where praise is due. Two and a half decades ago, young Cleveland Mayor Dennis Kucinich stood his ground, alone and defiant against deregulation of the power industry, corporate greed, and in the best interests of his constituents. Not only did he show courage, he paid a big price for it. What's more, he survived.

If anyone has earned the right to speak out on an issue that threatens the future of this country it is Dennis Kucinich. If anyone has earned a right to remind people of this history, it is Dennis Kucinich. Now, if he would just join with Texas investment banker and Bush energy advisor Matt Simmons [http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/082103_blackout_summary.html] in not only slamming deregulation but addressing Peak Oil and Gas issues and also take on the bubbling revelations that show that the administration held the door open on 9/11, lied about Iraq, and hold the government accountable for the money we need to fix things and develop alternative energy sources, we might just have a leader worth following to hell and back. We're going there anyway. - MCR]

----------

Lights Out on Deregulation

By Dennis Kucinich

With and estimated 50 million Americans and Canadians left without power and in some cases water, common sense requires us to reflect on the absurdity of deregulation of public utilities. In the first case, the right of utility franchise is vested in the people. We give utilities permission to operate, and enable them to set up a profit making business in exchange for the promise of affordable and reliable service. In 1992, investor owned utilities pushed the Democratic House to pass HR776 which granted electric utilities broad powers. The bill was supposed to restructure the electric utility industry to spur competition.

Utilities used deregulation to effect a series of mergers limiting competition. In order to accelerate profits, cost cutting ensued, involving the layoff of thousands of utility company employees, including some who were responsible for maintenance of generation, transmission, and distribution systems. A number of investor-owned http://www.ohiocitizen.org/campaigns/electric/pre2003/it_put.htm in the maintenance and repair of their own equipment, and, instead, cut costs to enhance the value of their stock rather than spending money to enhance the value of their service.

A prime case in point is http://www.firstenergycorp.com, late of Ohio. FirstEnergy formed through a merger of utility companies which owned nuclear power plants which often were neither used nor useful, and as a result incurred huge debt. FirstEnergy's predecessor, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) in the 1950s and 60s was a high performing blue chip stock until they invested in nuclear power. FirstEnergy has tried without success to keep online a very troublesome nuclear power facility at Port Clinton, Ohio, the Davis-Besse plant. Davis-Besse is currently shut down and has been for some time. FirstEnergy and federal regulators failed to properly monitor the operations of the plant, resulting in conditions where the plant's reactor vessel was threatened with a http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation/vessel-head-degradation-files/db-nozzle2-degradation.pdf when boric acid ate into the head of the reactor.

Millions of people in the Midwest and the water supply of our entire Great Lakes region were at risk because of First Energy's negligence, improper maintenance, and actual cover-up of the degradation of the reactor. Furthermore, federal regulators determined that notwithstanding the peril which was presented to one of the largest populated areas of the United States, FirstEnergy's financial condition necessitated the continued operation of the flawed reactor. The regulators put profit ahead of public interest.

If there was ever an example of an unholy alliance between government and industry, this is it. If there was ever an example of the failure of necessary regulation by the government of an investor-owned utility, it is found in the government's failure to regulate FirstEnergy, because now, according to published reports by the Associated Press, CNN, and ABC News, the blackout which affected an estimated 50 million people began in the FirstEnergy system.

I've been familiar with First Energy and the challenge of utility monopolies for over 30 years. Early in my career, in the 1970s, I watched FirstEnergy's predecessor, CEI, as they were hard at work trying to undermine the ability of the City of Cleveland to operate its own municipal electric system. CEI conducted a tireless crusade to attempt to put the city's publicly owned system, Muny Light, out of business. Muny Light competed against CEI in a third of the city and provided municipal power customers with savings on their electric bill of 20-30 percent. It also provided cheaper electricity for 76 city facilities and thousands of Cleveland street lights, saving taxpayers millions of dollars each year. In the 1970s, CEI applied for a license to operate a nuclear power plant. The license application triggered an antitrust review. The antitrust review revealed that CEI had committed numerous violations of federal antitrust law in its attempt to put Muny Light out of business. The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in an extensive investigation, determined that CEI blocked Muny Light from making repairs to its generator by lobbying the Cleveland City Council to place special conditions on Muny Light Bonds which made the bonds more difficult to sell, thereby depriving the city of revenue it needed to repair its generators in order to provide its own power. The delay in repairs to the generators caused Muny Light to have to purchase power. CEI then worked behind the scenes to block Muny Light from purchasing power from other power companies. CEI became the only power company Muny Light could buy from. At that point, CEI sharply increased and sometimes tripled the cost of purchase power to Muny Light. And, as a result, Muny Light began to lose money. CEI used Muny Light's weakened operational and financial condition (which they created) as evidence of the public system's lack of viability and as proof that the only way the people of Cleveland could have reliable power was for the city to sell its electric system to CEI. The antitrust review cited one incident when during a period of inclement weather, Muny Light asked CEI for a special transfer of emergency power. The transfer of power was conducted in such a way so as to cause an outage on the Muny Light system. CEI used the incident as further proof of the city's inability to operate a municipal electric system. Throughout this period, the Cleveland media, which received substantial advertising revenues from CEI, crusaded against the city's ownership of a municipal electric system. When the federal government came to review CEI's practices, CEI executives appeared at a city council committee meeting to declare that they had no interest in the acquisition of Muny Light even as they worked behind the scenes to put Muny Light out of business.

In 1976, after years of work to undermine Muny Light, CEI finally succeeded in getting the mayor and the council of Cleveland to agree to sell Muny Light, giving CEI a monopoly on electric power in the Cleveland area and enabling CEI to greatly expand its rate base to get more revenue to pay for its rapidly mounting expenses associated with building nuclear power plants. At that time, I was clerk of the Cleveland Municipal Court, a citywide elected office. I organized a civic campaign to save Muny Light. People gathered signatures in freezing rain to block the sale. I ran for mayor of Cleveland on a promise that if elected, my first act would be to cancel the sale of Muny Light. I won the election. I cancelled the sale. CEI immediately went to court to demand that the city pay 15 million dollars for power which it had purchased while CEI was running up charges to the city. The previous mayor had intended to pay that light bill by selling the light system and simultaneously disposing of a 325 million dollar antitrust damage suit. My election not only stopped the sale, but kept the lawsuit alive. CEI went to federal court to get an order attaching city equipment as a means of trying to destabilize city services as still another desperate effort to try to try to create a political climate to force the sale. I moved quickly to pay the bill by cutting city spending. The Muny Light issue came to a head on December 15, 1978, when Ohio's largest bank, Cleveland Trust, the 33rd largest bank in America at that time, told me that they would not renew the city's credit on 15 million dollars worth of loans taken out by the previous administration unless I would agree to sell Cleveland's municipally owned utility to CEI.

On that day, by that time, the sale of Muny Light was being promoted by both Cleveland newspapers, virtually all of the radio and TV stations in town, the entire business community, all the banks, both political parties, and several unions, as well as a majority of the Cleveland City Council. All I had to do was to sign my name to legislation and the system would have sold and the city credit "protected." The chairman of Cleveland Trust even offered 50 million dollars of new credit if I would agree to sell Muny Light.

Where I come from it matters how much people pay for electricity. I grew up in the inner city of Cleveland. The oldest of 7 children. My parents never owned a home, they lived in 21 different places by the time I was 17, including a couple of cars. I remember when there were 5 children and my parents living in a 3 room upstairs apartment on Cleveland's east side. My parents would sometimes sit in the kitchen at one of those old white enamel top tables, which, when the surface was chipped, was black underneath. When they counted their pennies, I could hear them clicking on the enamel top table. Click, Click, Click.

When I was in the board room with the Chairman of Cleveland Trust Bank, I was thinking about my parents counting their pennies and I could hear those pennies hitting the enamel top table. So, I said no to the sale of Muny Light to CEI. At Midnight, Cleveland Trust put the City of Cleveland into default. Later, it was revealed, that Cleveland Trust and CEI had four interlocking directors. Cleveland Trust was CEI's bank. Together with another bank, Cleveland Trust owned a substantial share of CEI stock and had numerous other mutual interests. Public power was saved in Cleveland. I lost the election in 1979 with default as the major issue. Cleveland Trust changed it name to AmeriTrust. The new mayor changed the name of Muny Light to Cleveland Public Power.

In 1993, the City of Cleveland announced that it was expanding Muny Light. It was the largest expansion of any municipal electric system in America. I had been long gone from major elected office. In fact, after the default, most political analysts considered my career over. I had been asked many times by other politicians why I just didn't make the deal and sell the light system, especially when my career was on the line. I believe that there are, in fact, some things more important than the next election.

When a reporter from the Cleveland Plain Dealer reached me to tell me about the expansion, I was on a beach in Malibu watching the dolphins play. Cleveland was the farthest thing from my mind. After I left City Hall, I couldn't get a job in Cleveland, I almost lost my home, and my marriage fell apart. But I had no real complaints, because, according to a US Senate Subcommittee studying organized crime in the Mid-Atlantic states, I had survived, through sheer luck, an assassination plot. There was something comforting looking out on the Pacific and watching the waves glisten in the sun.

So when a reporter told me that people were saying that the expansion could not have happened without my making a decision to save the system, I thought "that's nice." People in Cleveland began to say that I was right not to sell Muny Light and they asked me to come back. So I did. I ran for State Senate in 1994 on a slogan "because he was right" with little rays of yellow light shining behind my name on my campaign signs. I was one of the few Democrats to unseat a Republican incumbent that year in a state election.

Two years later, I was one of the few Democrats to unseat a Republican incumbent to gain election to Congress. My campaign signs had a light bulb behind my name with the words "Light up Congress." Today, I'm running for President of the United States and I want to light up America, and a good place to start will be to shed light on a deregulation process that has abandoned the public interest.

Dennis J. Kucinich
On the road to Davenport, Iowa

This entry and http://www.denniskucinich.us/index.php?topic=blog are licensed under a Creative Commons License.

posted by [ Dennis Kucinich ] on [ Aug 17 03 at 10:20 AM ] to [ ]

http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/001424.shtml

 

[Cerb]

It is already being done by businesses and government agencies.
The last thing we need is for it to be mandated! All that will do is take it from being a rare but uiseful tool to an utterly useless mess.