Originally posted by: AnyMal
If you want to see a moron, look in a mirror :roll: Reading comprehension is not your trait, is it?Originally posted by: AbAbber2k
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Hard to imagine. IMO, there has been nothing new in rock or pop music since The Beatles.
:roll:
Best you can do? Fel free to prove me wrong :roll:
You said nothing "new" not nothing "good". Define "new" and try again. You'd still come off as a pretentious moron living in the past though. Just because you don't like (or haven't taken the opportunity to experience) anything in the 30+ years since the Beatles doesn't mean there isn't anything "new" or worth listening to out there. Granted you did preceed your statement with "IMO."
Still, I'm willing to chalk your post up to flamebait-focused sarcasm. Probably just to get little Nickleback/50Cent/Emo/insert genre stereotype fanbois all riled up though.
And yes... the Monkees were superior to the Beatles in every way...
:laugh:
I use to ask my step-dad if the Beatles were ripping off the Monkees... he'd get so pissed. No sense of humor when it came to his cherished Beatles.
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Thats strange, my dad is a connoisseur of music and he thought that in the grand scheme of things the Beatles were really nothing special.Originally posted by: AbAbber2k
I use to ask my step-dad if the Beatles were ripping off the Monkees... he'd get so pissed. No sense of humor when it came to his cherished Beatles.
This came from a guy that owned most albums from the 40's through the 80's. (Which is a whole new discussion that we dont want to have here.)
I guess I feel the same way about Britney Spears. She's an icon and horribly famous and I cant figure out why other than really good promotion from her manager.
Originally posted by: BoomerD
http://www.fakebands.com/fakeband_m.html
"Monkees, The - Bert Schneider and Bob Rafelson created this band for the TV series, inspired by the Beatles' Hard Day's Night movie. One presumes the Beatles weren't available for a weekly series themselves. Peter Tork, Mike Nesmith, Micky Dolenz and Davy Jones formed the granddaddy of fake bands and one of the most successful, at least during the run of their 1966-1968 TV series. They gave the teenyboppers something to bob their heads and tap their toes to after the Beatles and other groups started dropping acid and making weirdo, undanceable concept albums. Has their formula been as successfully repeated? "
yeah, I know, they eventually meshed and actually became a "real band", but their hay-day was as phony as they get...
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Thats strange, my dad is a connoisseur of music and he thought that in the grand scheme of things the Beatles were really nothing special.Originally posted by: AbAbber2k
I use to ask my step-dad if the Beatles were ripping off the Monkees... he'd get so pissed. No sense of humor when it came to his cherished Beatles.
This came from a guy that owned most albums from the 40's through the 80's. (Which is a whole new discussion that we dont want to have here.)
I guess I feel the same way about Britney Spears. She's an icon and horribly famous and I cant figure out why other than really good promotion from her manager.
Led ZepplinOriginally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Hard to imagine. IMO, there has been nothing new in rock or pop music since The Beatles.
:roll:
Best you can do? Fel free to prove me wrong :roll:
Originally posted by: NTB
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: Gatecrasher3
i think the real question should be "what would the world be like without chuck berry"
Judas Priest would have never made an awesome cover of Johnny B. Goode.
and Back to the Future just wouldn't be the same
Nate
