• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How was windows 3.1 back in the day?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I remember my very own first computer was a 386SX-20 Mhz machine with little memory back in 1990 or 1991. Windows 3.1 was so slow on that machine, I remember I used to use DOS versions of all the programs I could - Wordperfect 5.1, Lotus 123, etc. I even remembers going out and buying a "DOS Rules" bumper sticker, because I was bemoaning the advent of a GUI and all that WYSIWYG crap they were toughting back then.

Then of course, as I bought my next computer with a 486DX-50Mhz processor, Windows 3.1 went to 95/98 and all was well.

I think the first decent Windows OS I used was Windows 2000 Professional, and I still use that to this day. 🙂

 
I too went from an Amiga (god I loved my machines) to a 486 sx25 ,4 meg memory and a 120mb HDD and it only had DOS.First day I got the PC I sat trying to work out what the hell to do with it in DOS,kept getting syntax errors,refusals to do anything without typing half the alphabet after each command (-p,-r,-wtf 😉) and thinking "what the hell have i done?? I want my Amiga back,I bought this POS so I could play Eye of the Beholder not sit looking at a cursor and a black screen" 😀

Personally if I could get EVERYTHING i want to run on a nix system I think I'd go for it and stick bindows in the bin.

BUT I gotta admit after struggling in DOS that Windows is a vast improvement,just hope Vista is an improvement and they actually bring out NEW versions unlike shoehorning the new features into a program that's basically 10 years out of date like XP,ME,2000 etc etc.
 
A small prayer everytime the system started, didn't like it much. Strangely enough 3.11 was better - the stability was much better. Games were tricky - far easier to slip into good, old DOS.

I had the memory fragmentation and the ini-files licked when Win95 came along. Well, it was better than 3.11 🙂 But it is only now with XP that I am starting to forgive Microsoft 🙂
 
There wasnt a single thing I couldnt do better in DOS. I wasnt even using the internet back then, so win3.1 was like a toy like 3dmark to tinker around with sans any substantial use for.
 
Back
Top