- Jun 19, 2000
- 1,832
- 3
- 81
Originally posted by: Rollo
Does it really matter? I don't think the performance difference of .2 is worth checking out.
My point is the difference that you would clock the memory based on a .2ns difference in RAM speed wouldn't be noticeable in performance. ("Golden Sample Orange Duckling" model or not, and I'm doubting their bulk pack is their best stuff in any case)Yes because the 3.3ns is the "golden sample" with higher memory clock speed
In his specific example, the RAM he's asking about might be 5% faster, your latter example is 10%. I stand by my .2ns RAM not making a noticeable difference on the Ti4200.also, you can't just say .2 is nothing. somthing like 5 to 4.8ns is small, but say from 2.2 to 2.0 ns, is huge.
Originally posted by: Rollo
In his specific example, the RAM he's asking about might be 5% faster, your latter example is 10%. I stand by my .2ns RAM not making a noticeable difference on the Ti4200.also, you can't just say .2 is nothing. somthing like 5 to 4.8ns is small, but say from 2.2 to 2.0 ns, is huge.
On the other hand, shouldn't the company you bought it from be able to tell you?