Your opinion is noted, however incorrect it might be. Touch test works perfectly. I can even get newbies to get it right. I'm not poking holes in my steak until it's ready for the knife.
Poking a steak with a meat thermometer is really really really really dumb.
Good job letting all that delicious juice out of your steak.
Stupid. Have you ever made a steak before? Is a steak somehow a water balloon that lets out all its moisture the second that you pierce it? Does a steak hold all of its moisture in a single 1x1 mm square of meat that suddenly all disappears when you make a hole? Considering you're cooking meat on a 500+ degree surface, how much moisture do you think is lost due to the fact that water boils at 212 versus poking it with a tiny stick?
Also, how is a touch test accurate? Does your finger suddenly know if its touching a particularly meaty area of the meat versus a fattier area? Because they will feel completely different. How about different thicknesses? A thick steak will feel completely different than a thing steak due to compression differences.
Stop cooking based on what you "feel" and cook based on objective fact. Your assertions that 1) the poke test is a good way to judge meat doneness and b) that poking a steak causes significant moisture loss has been disproven time and time again in modern cooking.
How is a subjective test better than a objective test. A steak will ALWAYS be medium rare at 130 degrees and ALWAYS be medium at 140. There is no wiggle room.