I recently acquired an Iomega external USB/Firewire hard drive. (I don't have a firewire port, but I made sure to get a drive with one for any future upgrade). Anyway, I've plugged it into the USB ports on two of my computers. On both, I get the message that "a high-speed USB device is plugged into a non-high-speed USB port," blah, blah, blah.
There's no doubt that both of these computers have USB 2.0 ports. I built one myself about a year or more ago, and I still have the box to the mobo, which clearly states "USB 2.0." The other is a Compaq laptop purchased in February of 2003.
I've done some web searches on this and inquired about it on a couple of other tech forums. Oddly, many people seem to have this problem. I've tried the usual advice, including downloading the latest drivers from VIA. I've read that I should look in Device Manager and check to see if the word "enhanced" appears next to the USB controller. It doesn't, no matter what I do. I've also been advised to run "MSINFO32.EXE" and look under "hardware > IRQs." Here are the results on my desktop box (the one I have the mobo box to):
IRQ 1 Standard 101/102-Key or Microsoft Natural PS/2 Keyboard OK
IRQ 3 Communications Port (COM2) OK
IRQ 4 Communications Port (COM1) OK
IRQ 6 Standard floppy disk controller OK
IRQ 8 System CMOS/real time clock OK
IRQ 9 Microsoft ACPI-Compliant System OK
IRQ 10 Microsoft(R) PCI Adapter MN-130 OK
IRQ 10 VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller OK
IRQ 10 Universal Serial Bus (USB) Controller OK
IRQ 11 MSI MS-StarForce GeForce4 Ti 4200 (NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200) OK
IRQ 11 Creative SB Live! Value (WDM) OK
IRQ 11 VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller OK
IRQ 11 VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller OK
IRQ 12 PS/2 Compatible Mouse OK
IRQ 13 Numeric data processor OK
IRQ 14 Primary IDE Channel OK
IRQ 15 Secondary IDE Channel OK
Again, I keep coming across people who have this problem. I've even come across one guy who claimed that he has to plug in his devices "slowly" to get them to operate at 2.0 speeds (?!?!). I've always assumed that my 2.0 ports are working like 2.0 ports, but I guess not. I understand that 2.0 is about 40x faster than 1.1, so I'd like to get this working if possible.
Advice?
thanks
=Aaron
There's no doubt that both of these computers have USB 2.0 ports. I built one myself about a year or more ago, and I still have the box to the mobo, which clearly states "USB 2.0." The other is a Compaq laptop purchased in February of 2003.
I've done some web searches on this and inquired about it on a couple of other tech forums. Oddly, many people seem to have this problem. I've tried the usual advice, including downloading the latest drivers from VIA. I've read that I should look in Device Manager and check to see if the word "enhanced" appears next to the USB controller. It doesn't, no matter what I do. I've also been advised to run "MSINFO32.EXE" and look under "hardware > IRQs." Here are the results on my desktop box (the one I have the mobo box to):
IRQ 1 Standard 101/102-Key or Microsoft Natural PS/2 Keyboard OK
IRQ 3 Communications Port (COM2) OK
IRQ 4 Communications Port (COM1) OK
IRQ 6 Standard floppy disk controller OK
IRQ 8 System CMOS/real time clock OK
IRQ 9 Microsoft ACPI-Compliant System OK
IRQ 10 Microsoft(R) PCI Adapter MN-130 OK
IRQ 10 VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller OK
IRQ 10 Universal Serial Bus (USB) Controller OK
IRQ 11 MSI MS-StarForce GeForce4 Ti 4200 (NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200) OK
IRQ 11 Creative SB Live! Value (WDM) OK
IRQ 11 VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller OK
IRQ 11 VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller OK
IRQ 12 PS/2 Compatible Mouse OK
IRQ 13 Numeric data processor OK
IRQ 14 Primary IDE Channel OK
IRQ 15 Secondary IDE Channel OK
Again, I keep coming across people who have this problem. I've even come across one guy who claimed that he has to plug in his devices "slowly" to get them to operate at 2.0 speeds (?!?!). I've always assumed that my 2.0 ports are working like 2.0 ports, but I guess not. I understand that 2.0 is about 40x faster than 1.1, so I'd like to get this working if possible.
Advice?
thanks
=Aaron