• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

How to appeal this citation - events clarified

ther00kie16

Golden Member
Mar 28, 2008
1,573
0
0
My first citation and wasn't my fault. Would like some advice as it's kinda tricky since the other vehicle was a city vehicle and shouldn't be either driver's fault.

Came to a stop sign, other direction had a red light roughly 150' off so cars were stopped/stopping.
Car slows to a stop in front of me in the middle of intersection. He sees me and backs up (car behind me stopped well behind) carefully (turned head around during backing up). He turns to me and waves, which I assumed to be a signal that I was okay to go.
I pull through and gets hit in the curb lane by the city vehicle that's going probably close to 30MPH. My vehicle gets totaled.
I couldn't see him since there were 3 or 4 cars behind the car that backed up to let me through.

I get written up for 4 pts for "FAILURE TO YIELD FROM STOP SIGN" and a fine. What should I do? What are my odds against a city vehicle? I'll definitely write in as opposed to wait for the trial date but what can I do to minimize the fine and points? I made a weak argument about the red light 150' away and that he was going too fast but the cop said that was for the next intersection.
What can I really contest and how should I go about it? There was a witness and he said pretty much the same thing I did so my words have backing. As the fine isn't that much (<$100), I'd rather not risk paying extra for court fees or whatever. I'd also rather not waste 3hr just to knock half of it off. Think I'm going to bike for awhile now (sucks as winter's coming) but does 4pts matter that much?


CLARIFIED EVENTS:
- Pull up to stop sign and sees car in inner lane creeping to a stop in intersection for red light 150' ahead

- Driver sees me, turns head while backing up and waves me through.

- I assume him to be a good citizen so I wave back and start to cross intersection

- I drive slowly and cautiously through and gets T-boned right behind front right wheel by city utility vehicle going probably 25+MPH.

How should I go about my appeals and what can I use in my favor to lessen my financial responsibility (and points, which I don't care as much since I'm a good driver and am unlikely to get into more accidents) if and when the city bills me for damages?

Other possibly relevant info: several cars in inner lane blocked my view of outer lane, which had a parked car ~100' back.
 
Last edited:

SlitheryDee

Lifer
Feb 2, 2005
17,252
19
81
A person waving you on doesn't mean you don't have to yield. You should have waited until the road was clear.

Edit: Wait, the other traffic had a stop light at the moment you were hit? Hmmm. I'm not sure what to make of that. You should have had right of way in that case. I you can find someone to witness for you you ought to be able to get the citation thrown out. I didn't think you had to pay court fees if you just make the court date on your ticket and plead not guilty, but I don't have experience with that really.
 
Last edited:

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
It's your fault, you can't proceed till it's clear to do so. Obviously, it wasn't clear.
Also, need paint diagram.
 

ther00kie16

Golden Member
Mar 28, 2008
1,573
0
0
A person waving you on doesn't mean you don't have to yield. You should have waited until the road was clear.

Edit: Wait, the other traffic had a stop light at the moment you were hit? Hmmm. I'm not sure what to make of that. You should have had right of way in that case. I you can find someone to witness for you you ought to be able to get the citation thrown out. I didn't think you had to pay court fees if you just make the court date on your ticket and plead not guilty, but I don't have experience with that really.

Other direction had a light 150' ahead. But curb lane, which is right turn only and had a car parked 100' back from the intersection or so, was where I got hit.

I did yield, but couldn't see the curb lane car since it was blocked off from view by several cars.
 

saratoga172

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2009
1,564
1
81
Other direction had a light 150' ahead. But curb lane, which is right turn only and had a car parked 100' back from the intersection or so, was where I got hit.

I did yield, but couldn't see the curb lane car since it was blocked off from view by several cars.

Need paint diagram but it sounds like you'll just have to suck it up. Even if someone waves you on it's your responsibility to make sure the road is clear.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
Your fault as far as I can see. Not sure what your argument could possibly be. It's your responsibility to see and avoid and if you can't see then you can't proceed.
 

CRXican

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2004
9,062
1
0
Sounds confusing but you can't assume a wave means you're clear.

Just like the person that gets waved to make a left turn into a driveway and then gets plowed by the guy flying up the third lane.

FAIL
 

Mr. Pedantic

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2010
5,027
0
76
You need a diagram. I have no idea how to decipher what you wrote into a coherent scenario where anybody could possibly be anything other than crazy.
 
Nov 5, 2001
18,366
3
0
if I understand your post, you were cutting across waiting traffic at an intersection, and a person in the inside lane hit you. You are at fault, you were responsible for failing to yield to oncoming traffic with the right of way.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
if I understand your post, you were cutting across waiting traffic at an intersection, and a person in the inside lane hit you. You are at fault, you were responsible for failing to yield to oncoming traffic with the right of way.

This unfortunately. Congestion sucks.
 

drebo

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,034
1
81
Other direction had a light 150' ahead. But curb lane, which is right turn only and had a car parked 100' back from the intersection or so, was where I got hit.

I did yield, but couldn't see the curb lane car since it was blocked off from view by several cars.

If the right-turn lane isn't marked, and the city vehicle was just trying to get around other cars without waiting for the light to turn, then it's not your fault. If the right-turn lane IS marked, then it is your fault, and there's nothing you can do about it.
 

D1gger

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
5,411
2
76
For the life of me I can't understand your description of events. It sounds like you had a stop sign, the cross traffic had no stop sign or signals, and you entered the intersection at the suggestion of another driver (who was stupidly backing out of the intersection) and were hit by a vehicle (which was owned by the city) that had the right of way.

And how are you going to argue that this isn't your fault?
 

dud

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,635
73
91
I did yield, but couldn't see the curb lane car since it was blocked off from view by several cars.



There's your answer right there. You couldn't see the curb lane ... but you went anyway.
 

ther00kie16

Golden Member
Mar 28, 2008
1,573
0
0
crashoy.jpg


Well, I gathered enough that legally it would most likely be my fault. However, I was wondering what kind of options I would have, especially since I would probably be billed damages. What can I argue? And if I have no legal points to base off of, what can I plead in my favor to lessen my financial responsibility in the case?

Actually, now to think of it, I'll probably get a separate case claim for the damages later as the driver isn't the owner of the city utility truck. So I need to think of what I need to do to prepare for that case.

Any suggestions other than previously perfect driving record, obstructed view and seemingly stopped traffic due to the red light?
 
Last edited:

bruceb

Diamond Member
Aug 20, 2004
8,874
111
106
Like it or not, it is your fault for not yielding. But talk to the prosecutor. You may be able to knock it down to "careless driving" which is usually only a 2 point offense as opposed to 4 points.
 

ther00kie16

Golden Member
Mar 28, 2008
1,573
0
0
Stop right there. you are at fault. His hand signals don't mean shit whether they were valid or not.

Yea yea, let's assume there are good citizens who back up to let others go (to think of it, i should've floored it before he crept into the intersection but i was being good and careful) and others who post good advice in response to those who ask for help on these forums. So if you can't get over the legal point of view that's been pointed out a dozen times already, can you offer some helpful advice how to appeal my case so I won't have to bend over and shell out thousands to the city for a minor grille damage, etc?
 
Oct 20, 2005
10,978
44
91
I hope I'm not the only one who can't really understand OPs description.

edit: just saw the ms paint diagram. ty, makes a lot more sense now.
 
Last edited:

ther00kie16

Golden Member
Mar 28, 2008
1,573
0
0
CLARIFIED EVENTS:
- Pull up to stop sign and sees car in inner lane creeping to a stop in intersection for light red light 150' ahead

- Driver sees me, turns head while backing up and waves me through.

- I assume him to be a good citizen so I wave back and start to cross intersection

- I drive slowly and cautiously through and gets T-boned in right behind front right wheel by city utility vehicle going probably 25+MPH.

How should I go about my appeals and what can I use in my favor to lessen my financial responsibility (and points, which I don't care as much since I'm a good driver and am unlikely to get into more accidents) if and when the city bills me for damages?

Other possibly relevant info: several cars in inner lane blocked my view of outer lane, which had a parked car ~100' back.

Attached pic again for convenince
crashoy.jpg
 
Last edited:

McWatt

Senior member
Feb 25, 2010
405
0
71
Get your state's vehicle code and look for technicalities. Vehicular laws are a tangled web of contradictions. I know someone in CA who is seemingly immune to driving laws despite regularly breaking them and getting caught. Even when the intention of the law clearly puts him at fault, he always, always wins his cases while representing himself thanks to knowing the 3" thick CA vehicle code book better than the police or lawyers involved in the cases. If you were he, I suspect the end result of this case would be the city paying you damages. I don't know how feasible it is for a normal person to do that, but you might at least find ways to protect yourself if the punishment is larger than expected.
 

calvinbiss

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2001
1,745
0
0
So the city car was proceeding to the red light in a right-turn only lane? IMO, the parked car is irrelevant. Also, my guess is that 30 mph is likely the speed limit, so the driver of the city car is not at fault for that either.

If that's the case, I don't see how you have any argument. As others have said, it was obviously not clear for you to cross the intersection.
 
Last edited: