- Jun 3, 2012
- 4,102
- 0
- 0
@lavaheadache would still need a new card to though ?
what? are you saying a gtx260 can sufficiently run higher settings and full hardware physx? sorry but that is simply not true.Guessing you are asking if you'd still need a second card to run PhysX?
Answer is no. Most cards from the GTX 260 up through today's can handle the PhysX load without impacting gaming FPS significantly. Forget where I saw benchmarks but shouldn't be too hard to find.
pci? what exactly are you saying? are you wanting to run hardware physx with an Nvidia card in the pci slot? there is no pci slot card that can handle physx.gonna try it hope it works with pci
@lavaheadache would still need a new card to though ?
I did not realize they even made a pci gt430. thats the bare minimum card you want for physx but I bet the pci bus limits what that card can even do. and how many game do you even play that have optional hardware physx? Batman AC is about the only game made in the last 2 years with it.no im gonna get a new AMD video card and get a pci nvidia card for physx
like this
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814500221
Well if you're so intent on wasting money then how about this?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814500233
If you actually want better performance save up and get a new motherboard and card for PhysX at the same time.
a gt520 is horrible for physx.Well if you're so intent on wasting money then how about this?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814500233
If you actually want better performance save up and get a new motherboard and card for PhysX at the same time.
why would i need a new board ?
ok thx Physx out now ?