How the right wing lie machine works

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,181
32,592
136
This is an abject lesson on how their machine/conspiracy really works. The subject is the recent published unemployment number of 7.8%. A few people came out soon after and claimed Obama or his people cooked the books of this report. In particular Jack Welch former GE CEO.

Here is a discussion of the subject. Chris Hayes and his guest go into detail on why this is not possible. Included in the clip Jack Welch is grilled by Chris Matthews. Pay special attention to 1:45 - 2:50

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/up-with-chris-hayes/49311773#49311773

In that minute is the birth of the latest lie soon to be spread by Fox News and all other right wing outlets as real news.

Chris: "Do you have any evidence Obama got to the people at the BLS?"
Jack: "I have no evidence but I raised the question."

But that's not what Jack really did. Now Drudge, Newsmax and other websites will run headlines. Other right wing talk show hosts will pick this up and run with it. Soon to be followed by Fox News with their headlines,"some people have said Obama cooked the books"
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
This is an abject lesson on how their machine/conspiracy really works. The subject is the recent published unemployment number of 7.8%. A few people came out soon after and claimed Obama or his people cooked the books of this report. In particular Jack Welch former GE CEO.

Here is a discussion of the subject. Chris Hayes and his guest go into detail on why this is not possible. Included in the clip Jack Welch is grilled by Chris Matthews. Pay special attention to 1:45 - 2:50

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/up-with-chris-hayes/49311773#49311773

In that minute is the birth of the latest lie soon to be spread by Fox News and all other right wing outlets as real news.

Chris: "Do you have any evidence Obama got to the people at the BLS?"
Jack: "I have no evidence but I raised the question."

But that's not what Jack really did. Now Drudge, Newsmax and other websites will run headlines. Other right wing talk show hosts will pick this up and run with it. Soon to be followed by Fox News with their headlines,"some people have said Obama cooked the books"

They learned this from mainstream media. So why don't you be mad at them. Have you seen months that a figure comes out and then it is adjusted to a number that does not even look like the original number. Yes.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,181
32,592
136
They learned this from mainstream media. So why don't you be mad at them. Have you seen months that a figure comes out and then it is adjusted to a number that does not even look like the original number. Yes.

The UE numbers are back adjusted all the time since the number in a given month is an estimate. There are 2 sources for these estimates and it's been that way since at least the Clinton admin.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
no shit. Your whole look at this lie stuff is soo massively hypocritical. So much so you cannot even see it? You are completely desensitized to this from the main stream media every day you think it is the truth.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,181
32,592
136
no shit. Your whole look at this lie stuff is soo massively hypocritical. So much so you cannot even see it? You are completely desensitized to this from the main stream media every day you think it is the truth.

Care to back that up with example? Or are you just proving my point?
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Take the 9/11 attack on our embassies. Do you really believe it was a coincidence it was on 9/11 and the real reason was because of an internet video for starters.

Fucking blind. Do you not Know the media is in bed for Obama or are they real news people just trying to report the truth?
 

Schmide

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2002
5,741
1,030
126
That's not a media bias??? That's just reporting facts and holding back on the unknowns.

So your justification that the main stream media has bias is they don't promote conspiracy theories?
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,972
140
106
msnbc..their viewership is lower then snail snot for good reason. Even libTards don't watch it.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,181
32,592
136
Take the 9/11 attack on our embassies. Do you really believe it was a coincidence it was on 9/11 and the real reason was because of an internet video for starters.

Fucking blind. Do you not Know the media is in bed for Obama or are they real news people just trying to report the truth?

Neither you or I knows what evidence was available on the day of those attacks. I do know, no matter what evidence I had I wouldn't have announced it that day. It would take a least a few days if not weeks to confirm anything you had.

Susan Rice did not get on the news annoucing a reason for the attacks knowing she had zero evidence. Her mistake was using the video and not leaving herself an out.

Unlike within a few days of the real 9/11 the Bush admin making plans to go after Sadam and we know how that turned out.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
LoL so common sense dictates what it is and you want to wait 3 days to confirm it wasn't a stupid video? From Day one I said it was a red herring. I cannot believe we appologized for that crap. Crazy.

Dood no one is talking about Bush. But since you are. CBS CREATED PHONY DOCUMENTS to unseat a sitting president. They thought the Mainstream media would catch on and some did and now Dan Rather is a joke.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
LoL so common sense dictates what it is and you want to wait 3 days to confirm it wasn't a stupid video? From Day one I said it was a red herring. I cannot believe we appologized for that crap. Crazy.
So what are you suggesting here? What should the media have done, given the only information they had at that moment was the official statements? Just make something up and report idle speculation as fact? Maybe that's OK for Fox, but not for reputable journalists.


Dood no one is talking about Bush. But since you are. CBS CREATED PHONY DOCUMENTS to unseat a sitting president. They thought the Mainstream media would catch on and some did and now Dan Rather is a joke.
False. You've absorbed the RNC propaganda and accepted it as fact. CBS did NOT create the document. They received it from a former Guard member who was in a position to have the information he provided. Further, they corroborated the content of the document with the secretary of the officer who allegedly wrote the report. While she did not have an original copy to compare, she agreed it matched her memory of the events at that time. CBS therefore ran with the story.

Yes, it turned out CBS was likely duped. The document they received was almost certainly printed from a modern word processor, not from the typewriters commonly used by the Guard in those days. It was never determined, however, whether the content of the document sent to CBS was copied from an original, or whether it was a fabrication. Either way, it was generally accurate according to the secretary. That fact got lost in the RNC-fueled furor around the document's format.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
No they should have done some homework and get some people on the ground and not spew out a Turd that the obama administration pulled out of their ass so they would not look as bad. When someone hands you a turd and calls it a donut don't report it as a donut. Fox has nothing to do with it. I am not sure I can list more than a handful of reputable journalists. Can you?

CBS Created the Story. That is a better way of putting it. Maybe not the document but they took the seed planted it. They gave it water. And put it out in the sun and gave it miracle grow...
 

monovillage

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2008
8,444
1
0
This is almost as bad as Senate Majority leader Harry Reid lying about Romney's taxes. Saying that some mystery investor told me......

who said : "I say run with it until Mittens releases 12 years of tax returns (fathers standard) ''

Ohhhh the Democrat lefty outrage is so hypocritical.
 

buckshot24

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2009
9,916
85
91
This is almost as bad as Senate Majority leader Harry Reid lying about Romney's taxes. Saying that some mystery investor told me......

who said : "I say run with it until Mittens releases 12 years of tax returns (fathers standard) ''

Ohhhh the Democrat lefty outrage is so hypocritical.
No kidding.
 

IBMer

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2000
1,137
0
76
This is hardly paranoid. This happens all the time.

First example, the Obama trip to India that was going to have our entire navy as an escort and cost something like 300 billion dollars. It was just a rumor from an unconfirmed source, but it was all over right wing media and when proven completely false and even absurd they didn't really back track it.

Just 2 weeks ago, Fox New ran with a Brienbart story that was trying to state that the US was going to give up the people involved in the Anti-Islam film to the Egyptian government to be killed.

This happens over and over, they say something unproven, then all the other right wing sites and shows run with it and then people take it as fact even without having any source because "Its all over the internet" or "All these sites say its happening."

You can always tell its completely successful when the extreme right wingers all use the same rhetoric when talking about Obama or the White House.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
I do love the duh-version back to the 2004 CBS imbroglio wrt Bush's national guard records. CBS had evidence, and they had confirmation, yet they were wrong.

That doesn't compare at all to Welch's naked innuendo wrt unemployment numbers, for which he has no evidence whatsoever. But, of course, he's just "raising the question" as if it had any merit, rather than because it's convenient to do so.

Righties think it's "the same" in their usual false equivalence way... Once again illustrating that they believe what they want to believe.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,749
6,319
126
I do love the duh-version back to the 2004 CBS imbroglio wrt Bush's national guard records. CBS had evidence, and they had confirmation, yet they were wrong.

That doesn't compare at all to Welch's naked innuendo wrt unemployment numbers, for which he has no evidence whatsoever. But, of course, he's just "raising the question" as if it had any merit, rather than because it's convenient to do so.

Righties think it's "the same" in their usual false equivalence way... Once again illustrating that they believe what they want to believe.


Dude, the exploding pickup!

You Liberals and your pot smokin memory losing redistributin minds! Redistributin!!!!!!!!!

:colbert:
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,181
32,592
136
LoL so common sense dictates what it is and you want to wait 3 days to confirm it wasn't a stupid video? From Day one I said it was a red herring. I cannot believe we appologized for that crap. Crazy.

Dood no one is talking about Bush. But since you are. CBS CREATED PHONY DOCUMENTS to unseat a sitting president. They thought the Mainstream media would catch on and some did and now Dan Rather is a joke.

But in the Bush case there was evidence. Nobody just put it out there and hope it stuck.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,181
32,592
136
This is almost as bad as Senate Majority leader Harry Reid lying about Romney's taxes. Saying that some mystery investor told me......

who said : "I say run with it until Mittens releases 12 years of tax returns (fathers standard) ''

Ohhhh the Democrat lefty outrage is so hypocritical.

Your are right. Harry Reid tried to give birth to a rumor. In that case the so called "MSM" didn't pick it up and try to report it as fact. Actually they said Harry is only stating a rumor.