- Jul 10, 2007
- 12,041
- 3
- 0
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
oh ok, so how come it hasn't become full blown aids yet?
sex ed was like too long ago.
Originally posted by: Xanis
he has HIV, not AIDS. there's a difference.
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
He looks good though he's wearing a fugly suit.
Yup, antiviral drugs are very effective against HIV. Main problem is they are costly and therefore out of reach of the majority of HIV patients. I had no idea they were so hard on the body, though. But even taking this into account, it's probably better than the alternative (AIDS).Originally posted by: Blackjack200
Text
Cliffs:
1. AIDS is incurable right now because when we throw toxic substances at it (medicine) It just mutates and develops resistance
2. To counter this, doctors hit it with 3 or 4 powerful drugs at the same time (drug cocktail). This is devastating to the Virus, but doesn't quite wipe it out. Over a long period of time (up to 10 years) strains of the virus evolve that are immune to all the drugs in the cocktail.
3. When the Virus has recovered, doctors will switch the cocktail, and this usually restarts the cycle.
This can continue as long as the patient can withstand the medicine - the regimen is VERY hard on the body; I imagine like chemotherapy, but maybe not as severe.
I'm sure someone on here knows a lot more about this than I do, and that I've made some glaring mistakes. Please correct me.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
He looks good though he's wearing a fugly suit.
Huh?
Are you referring to a picture that you're looking at? Because we don't see it. Or do you have a real-time feed on what he's currently wearing?
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Or do you have a real-time feed on what he's currently wearing?Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
He looks good though he's wearing a fugly suit.
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
He looks good though he's wearing a fugly suit.
Huh?
Are you referring to a picture that you're looking at? Because we don't see it. Or do you have a real-time feed on what he's currently wearing?
No, he was a commentator during half-time.
