Originally posted by: ForumMaster
😕
i have a single drive. if it fails, i won't lose any important data. know why? cause i burned it 3 times and put discs in different places. the chances of all 3 discs (not in the same house) not working is very very small. what data are you dealing with that makes you so paranoid?
Originally posted by: wired247
I agree that the safest way to save your data is to back up frequently.
However the one nice thing about a raid-5 or raid-6 array is the ability for the array to keep working on-line even with a totally dead HD.
Raid-0 + large backup drive is a great way to go!
Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
Originally posted by: wired247
I agree that the safest way to save your data is to back up frequently.
However the one nice thing about a raid-5 or raid-6 array is the ability for the array to keep working on-line even with a totally dead HD.
Raid-0 + large backup drive is a great way to go!
How do you backup 2TB of data? You can't do that on a single drive.
So you suggesting making another raid array to use as a backup, no?
Originally posted by: ch33zw1z
Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
Originally posted by: wired247
I agree that the safest way to save your data is to back up frequently.
However the one nice thing about a raid-5 or raid-6 array is the ability for the array to keep working on-line even with a totally dead HD.
Raid-0 + large backup drive is a great way to go!
How do you backup 2TB of data? You can't do that on a single drive.
So you suggesting making another raid array to use as a backup, no?
Steer clear of "RAID" 0, shouldn't even be considered RAID. What you're planning is good, but taking regular backups is a must no matter what array type you go with. Of course, backing up 2TB(correct?) of data is no easy task...time and money wise. You may want to look at a RAID 5 over four disks with a hot spare, if you have that kind of cash. How much are you going to sink into this setup?
Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
I want to make a raid array and raid 5 is definitely the way to go.. but I am still scared. It seems like is still pretty possible for two drive to fail at once.
edit:
So after actually doing some research raid 6 would take care of the above problem.
Originally posted by: fisher
Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
I want to make a raid array and raid 5 is definitely the way to go.. but I am still scared. It seems like is still pretty possible for two drive to fail at once.
edit:
So after actually doing some research raid 6 would take care of the above problem.
safer than with raid 0, but not safe enough to not do tape or cd/dvd backups as well.
Originally posted by: Fullmetal Chocobo
Originally posted by: fisher
Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
I want to make a raid array and raid 5 is definitely the way to go.. but I am still scared. It seems like is still pretty possible for two drive to fail at once.
edit:
So after actually doing some research raid 6 would take care of the above problem.
safer than with raid 0, but not safe enough to not do tape or cd/dvd backups as well.
😕 Safer with RAID 0??? I can imagine some reasoning for using RAID 0, but safer??
I have used RAID 5 with a backup for years. I have had my RAID 5 array go down due to power supply issues (PSU hiccuped and dropped 2 drives...). Also had my entire DVD backup go south when the RAID 5 died. Not a fun day. My current solution = RAID 5 for storage, images, documents, and media; SVN + backup for essential data (docs), thumbdrive for docs, DVD data archiving, and external hd for media (digital pics that can't be replaced).
Originally posted by: fisher
Originally posted by: Fullmetal Chocobo
Originally posted by: fisher
Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
I want to make a raid array and raid 5 is definitely the way to go.. but I am still scared. It seems like is still pretty possible for two drive to fail at once.
edit:
So after actually doing some research raid 6 would take care of the above problem.
safer than with raid 0, but not safe enough to not do tape or cd/dvd backups as well.
😕 Safer with RAID 0??? I can imagine some reasoning for using RAID 0, but safer??
I have used RAID 5 with a backup for years. I have had my RAID 5 array go down due to power supply issues (PSU hiccuped and dropped 2 drives...). Also had my entire DVD backup go south when the RAID 5 died. Not a fun day. My current solution = RAID 5 for storage, images, documents, and media; SVN + backup for essential data (docs), thumbdrive for docs, DVD data archiving, and external hd for media (digital pics that can't be replaced).
yes. i'd feel safer with raid 5 than raid 0. however i would still do backups to something other than a hard drive, which is not really something that has a reliable shelf life. however, starting with raid 5 is not a bad idea if you have data that is sensitive, certainly more than using raid 0. at the end of the day i'd still be backing up to tape or cd/dvd tho.
i think you got confused as to what i was saying. the topic was "how safe would you feel with a raid 5 array?" and my answer was "safer than using raid 0" because that was suggested in the thread at least once. i did however also state that proper backups should be done. 🙂
Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
Well I think you guys that back up to DVD are crazy. If you actually had 2TB that would be 500 DVD's.
Originally posted by: MichaelD
This is a pretty good thread. 🙂
"How safe do I feel with RAID5?" Depends on a lot of factors:
- What kind of RAID5 array are we talking about (Hardware/Software?)
- Assuming hardware, is it a dedicated controller with a BBU?
- How many disks?
- Are we on a surge protector, a small UPS or a large UPS with shutdown software?
- Is that data backed up anywhere else?
- HOW MUCH data?
- How IMPORTANT is that data?
At work I have a 4TB array with about 3.5TB of data on it. The array has 42 drives ; 3 are hotspares. The array is backed up to tape; not all at once though. We do various incremental and full backups of the various databases and folders on different days. Once a month we rotate a set of the full backup tapes to an offsite location.
I feel very confident in my giant RAID5 array b/c we have great backups, and b/c of the hotspare drives. Without the backups, I'd still be nervous b/c that data is absolutely mission-critical. I.E. most of the 800+ users could not do their job w/o that data and it would result in a business-STOP situation.
For a home-user/home office situation, "how safe" depends on how much money you want to dedicate to feeling safe. 😉
A big UPS with shutdown software AND a real RAID controller with a battery backup AND an online hot-spare would be an excellent start. Daily/weekly backups to an external drive or tape would seal the deal for "safe."
So, how much "safe" do you want? Got deep pockets?
If not, do this: Get a couple of 750GB drives, run them RAID1 on your motherboard's RAID controller AND make backups to DVDs or an external HD. I've done that for years at home. No issues.
Originally posted by: tw1164
You may just want to look into a WHS based solution.
WHS has an interesting storage pool technology where files are duplicated to another disk, it's a quasi-RAID 1 that can be expanded and contracted at any time. That said I'm not entirely sure why he's recommending it.Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
Originally posted by: tw1164
You may just want to look into a WHS based solution.
WHS? Does that stand for Windows Home Server? What is so great about that?