Lets look at a couple of examples. At stock that CPU has the vCore set at 1.10V. Lets say for example this is a 75W CPU. Couldn't find information on actual wattage rating so we'll go with that for now. Exact numbers aren't important at the moment. That puts the CPU at pulling about 68A. So if you bump the Vcore to 1.25V then the CPU is pulling about 85W. With 1.3v that would be about 88.4W. Now if the stock wattage of the CPU is lower or higher the difference between 1.25V and 1.3V will be different but this gives you a basic idea of how much the power ussage jumps with small changes in the vCore.
we have to take into consideration that when you OC a cpu by changing its FSB you're also OCing the chipset (via the faster FSB) which makes that use more power too. then you have the RAM which also gets OCed unless you run mem dividers, which is usually not ideal. The only real way to isolate the cpu is if you only OC or UC by changing the multiplier. If you have a wattage measure then you can use that to collect enough data to get a reasonably accurate estimate.
If you want a dollar value, I'd imagine it's pennies per month depending on how often the machine is under a load.
Thanks tons!
I think 20-30w difference is enough for me to downclock to 3.6. If I need more power in the future, I'll bump it back up to 4ghz.
Honestly, if you are that worried about 20-30W, you need to look into a netbook or other low power device and get rid of the i7.
the toms hardware article linked earlier shows that the difference between 3.6 and 4.0 is far greater than 20-30 watts when the computer is under load.
And how much power you are saving does not necessarily need to be motivated by cost. It could also be to put the psu and other components under less stress, make the system run cooler and quieter.
Like I said though, if you torrent alot a netbook is a good idea to have. Torrenting is a background non-intensive task anyways and you'd be spending 15 or so watts on average, as opposed to the 100-200W of an idling desktop.
then why are you overclocking and stressing components in the first place?
Honestly, if you are that worried about 20-30W, you need to look into a netbook or other low power device and get rid of the i7.
because you're like me and like to see how fast the damn thing will go. We're like a cheaper version of car enthusiasts![]()
1 year = 8760hrs
8760x30W = 262,800W a year saved
262kwh = $70 (elec, deliv, taxes, etc) a year...$5/month
Since I do not see any performance difference from 4 to 3.6, I'd rather be conscious about my power consumption.
See sig, I do both, I'm screwed. Though at times the PC hobby costs more than the car does.
Personally, I see this as a complete waste. I'm not gonna worry about a mere $5 when you could have saved more than that on a better suited hardware purchase.
See sig, I do both, I'm screwed. Though at times the PC hobby costs more than the car does.
Why waste energy when I don't need the power at all? It's like turning on the shower water while going #2.
what do you mean by better suited hardware? Netbook or shuttles dont have the performances that I want.
All I need is 3.6 i7 performance, not 4.0ghz i7. Why waste energy when I don't need the power at all? It's like turning on the shower water while going #2.
What program are you running that runs well on a 3.6GHz i7 but doesn't run well on a 2.66GHz i7?
If you're all about saving energy dollars, why not go back to stock speeds and manually reduce your vcore to 1.0 volts?
Why waste energy?
Most people can't tell the difference between a 3.6GHz i7 and a 2.66GHz one unless they benchmark.
You might want to check this article:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock-core-i7,2268-10.html
Haters of overclocking generally are folks that failed and threw in the towel and are jealous of those greeted with success.![]()