How much performance would you see from 1T instead of 2T in games?

[ExtremePVDman]

5% or 10%??

 

[JonnyBlaze]

not even close to that much.

 

[essasin]

I believe the real time performance gain is not very noticeble at all.

 

[KoolDrew]

Why do you ask?

 

[DerelictDev]

A few seconds off load time. In my rig i at least "thought" i noticed a few second speed up (10s) loading bf2, but then again it could just be me ;p

Other than that i didn't see any improvement in gameplay.

 

[KoolDrew]

Originally posted by: DerelictDev
A few seconds off load time. In my rig i at least "thought" i noticed a few second speed up (10s) loading bf2, but then again it could just be me ;p

Other than that i didn't see any improvement in gameplay.

It's just you. There is no way going to 1T from 2T would decrease loading times by 10 seconds.

 

[F1shF4t]

just wondering, but wouldnt load times be more dependent on hard drive, it takes proly less than a second to fully fill ur ram, but ur hard drive cant read 1gig of info in 1 second.

 

[KoolDrew]

Originally posted by: Dark Cupcake
just wondering, but wouldnt load times be more dependent on hard drive, it takes proly less than a second to fully fill ur ram, but ur hard drive cant read 1gig of info in 1 second.

Yes.

 

[Gomce]

zero, in fact, 1t + overclocked ram = choppy frames sometimes and frame dips

 

[furballi]

Can't tell by the user. You need benchmark like Super Pi to differentiate between 1T and 2T.