Originally posted by: DrPizza
If you want to be correct in the context of a science class (but be perceived as a smartass):
"How much does a 250 ml flask weigh in grams? NOTHING! Because grams aren't a unit of weight. Grams are a unit of MASS. I assume this was a trick question to see if we were paying attention."
The SI unit of weight is the Newton. Grams and kilograms are used informally as measurements of weight. However, informally should never include in a science classroom. Of course, I know in advance that there are people out there who feel that's it's okay to be lazy about the definitions in a chemistry class. Here you go, so no one needs to feel that they "proved me wrong" by finding some place that points out that grams aren't weight, "but it's okay in a chemistry class, but never in a physics class." Bullshit. I'm 17 weeks into the school year and *STILL* correcting a bad habit of students in physics class that should never have been allowed to become a habit in the first place. (It's one of my personal pet peeves, and I suspect, a pet peeve of physics teachers everywhere.)
Originally posted by: smack Down
Just copy someone else's lab.
Originally posted by: rezinn
I want to say about 450g based on memory for a 250ml erlenmeyer flask, but that seems heavy to me now.
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
DrPizza - Teacher, Goat Keeper, Science Nazi
Originally posted by: DrPizza
If you want to be correct in the context of a science class (but be perceived as a smartass):
"How much does a 250 ml flask weigh in grams? NOTHING! Because grams aren't a unit of weight. Grams are a unit of MASS. I assume this was a trick question to see if we were paying attention."
The SI unit of weight is the Newton. Grams and kilograms are used informally as measurements of weight. However, informally should never include in a science classroom. Of course, I know in advance that there are people out there who feel that's it's okay to be lazy about the definitions in a chemistry class. Here you go, so no one needs to feel that they "proved me wrong" by finding some place that points out that grams aren't weight, "but it's okay in a chemistry class, but never in a physics class." Bullshit. I'm 17 weeks into the school year and *STILL* correcting a bad habit of students in physics class that should never have been allowed to become a habit in the first place. (It's one of my personal pet peeves, and I suspect, a pet peeve of physics teachers everywhere.)
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
I just made up values and false calculations. I was honest in my conclusion portion, though. I said I couldn't come to any conclusions because the lab was utter failure. There was some fatal calculations here and there, and much of the data wasn't recorded.
Oh, well. Hope I get at least some credit.
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Someone better tell engineers that kg/m and g/cm are not valid torque units.
Originally posted by: rezinn
I want to say about 450g based on memory for a 250ml erlenmeyer flask, but that seems heavy to me now.
edit: If you google "Erlenmeyer flask weighs" you get a bunch of homework problems. It looks like a 125ml flask might weigh about 121g, 250 about 240-260g, and maybe 500ml weighs 450g.