How much do co-stars get paid?

[Ns1]

Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
I have a bigger e-penis than both of you.

pics?

 

[pstylesss]

Originally posted by: Ns1

Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
I have a bigger e-penis than both of you.

pics?

 

[alkemyst]

Originally posted by: Ns1

Originally posted by: alkemyst
i work for a mortgage company and see their financials which trumps your thoughts on what may happen outside the copy room.

orly now?

I see the checks being written to the agencies/talent

GGPO

my "copy room" > your mortgage company

GO YOU!, but probably not true since we are a top 10 nationally.

 

[Ns1]

Originally posted by: alkemyst

Originally posted by: Ns1

Originally posted by: alkemyst
i work for a mortgage company and see their financials which trumps your thoughts on what may happen outside the copy room.

orly now?

I see the checks being written to the agencies/talent

GGPO

my "copy room" > your mortgage company

GO YOU!, but probably not true since we are a top 10 nationally.

lol, I work for WB

So, to summarize

Big players with clout AND leading roles get fat participation checks
Big players with supporting roles get smaller participation checks
Smaller players with little clout rarely get participation checks
Smaller players with clout usually get participation deals that are ridiculously hard to make money from

 

[Krazy4Real]

Ns1 and alkemyst need a timeout so they can learn to play nice with each other.

 

[JohnCU]

Originally posted by: Ns1

Originally posted by: alkemyst

Originally posted by: Ns1

Originally posted by: alkemyst
i work for a mortgage company and see their financials which trumps your thoughts on what may happen outside the copy room.

orly now?

I see the checks being written to the agencies/talent

GGPO

my "copy room" > your mortgage company

GO YOU!, but probably not true since we are a top 10 nationally.

lol, I work for WB

So, to summarize

Big players with clout AND leading roles get fat participation checks
Big players with supporting roles get smaller participation checks
Smaller players with little clout rarely get participation checks
Smaller players with clout usually get participation deals that are ridiculously hard to make money from

pwnage

 

[alkemyst]

Originally posted by: JohnCU

Originally posted by: Ns1

lol, I work for WB

So, to summarize

Big players with clout AND leading roles get fat participation checks
Big players with supporting roles get smaller participation checks
Smaller players with little clout rarely get participation checks
Smaller players with clout usually get participation deals that are ridiculously hard to make money from

pwnage

I don't see how a copy boy owned me with this. Like I said though, most studios are CURRENTLY avoiding giving even A-lists a cut of future profits.

He hasn't proven anything.

 

[Injury]

Originally posted by: alkemyst
i work for a mortgage company and see their financials which trumps your thoughts on what may happen outside the copy room.

Is it possible for you to go even a week without turning a thread into a giant pile of shit by trying to act like you've not only done everything and seen everything in the whole wide world, but that you've done it better than everyone else? Will you ever just learn to forgo your ego and understand that none of us want to read 99% of the shit you post bragging about some unprovable, stupid, meaningless, details to debates that really don't need to be said?

 

[ric1287]

Originally posted by: Injury

Originally posted by: alkemyst
i work for a mortgage company and see their financials which trumps your thoughts on what may happen outside the copy room.

Is it possible for you to go even a week without turning a thread into a giant pile of shit by trying to act like you've not only done everything and seen everything in the whole wide world, but that you've done it better than everyone else? Will you ever just learn to forgo your ego and understand that none of us want to read 99% of the shit you post bragging about some unprovable, stupid, meaningless, details to debates that really don't need to be said?

apparently not

 

[GagHalfrunt]

A no name with no box office clout and no leverage is almost certainly working for scale. Currently that's about $750 a day. Those who can get it are grateful, very few actors have the standing to be able to turn down parts working for scale.

 

[alkemyst]

Originally posted by: Injury

Originally posted by: alkemyst
i work for a mortgage company and see their financials which trumps your thoughts on what may happen outside the copy room.

Is it possible for you to go even a week without turning a thread into a giant pile of shit by trying to act like you've not only done everything and seen everything in the whole wide world, but that you've done it better than everyone else? Will you ever just learn to forgo your ego and understand that none of us want to read 99% of the shit you post bragging about some unprovable, stupid, meaningless, details to debates that really don't need to be said?

Wasn't me that started it. You just contributed though. gratz.

 

[JS80]

i heart this thread

 

[Ns1]

I don't see how a copy boy owned me with this. Like I said though, most studios are CURRENTLY avoiding giving even A-lists a cut of future profits.

He hasn't proven anything.

I'm not sure how I can prove anything to you, given that I can't post any contracts or numbers without getting fired; you know, client confidentiality and all.

I'm sure the numbers you obtain in the mortgage industry are a more accurate reflection of an actor's proceeds from their movies than my numbers, based upon contracts negotiated between the talent and the studio.