JingP,
And how are your "very knowledgeable friends" determining this? I certianly hope it isn't via socket-thermistor measurements on AMD chips....
hardtech4U Internal diode "mod". Just in case your very knowledgeable friends are using the most inaccurate form of CPU temp measurement. note hte key "numbers". When he turned off the water-pump, diode jumped to 70-80C, socket-thermsitor still showed 42C. SOcket-thermistors are not suitable for grease testing or heatsink testing. Further evidence from teh VoidYourWarranty internal diode testing showed 5-7C internal diode temperature changes with
ZERO socket-thermistor temp change.
Internal diode P3 and P4 grease testing shows very noticeable temperature differences.
Such as this site:
p4 Internal diode testing. Despite very obvious flaws such as not properly cleaning the IHS completely, in addition to testing grease on a p4 (where the IHS and large contact surface minimize the benefits of a thermal compound of any type), there are very noticeable gains in performance that are not 95% marketing.
And before I get slammed for "pimping AS" or "working for AS"(which simply isn't true), this post also applies to other greases and heatsink conclusions that
could be gathered from inaccurate sources. this is an FYI post first and foremost.
Mike
P.S. Hopefully WarCon will come and post in this thread regarding AS thermal grease effectiveness. Even though his previous thread was deleted, he found that, with his watercooling setup, he could overclocker higher with AS2 (and early samples of AS3) than he could with other greases. That's a pretty good example of how AS isn't marketing.