• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How many WPM do employers consider good?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
WPM is the biggest load of shit in the world. I took a typing test, got over 65 WPM (with backspacing and corrections) and got complimented. When I started working, I'd type at my regular, relaxed 30-40 WPM. Unless you're plagarizing books, what's the point? Even then, you could scan it nowadays.
 
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: Farang
If typing is your strong point you may as well work at McDonalds.

Data entry gets you more than McDonalds.

lmao u need 2 incl the cost of the free big macs at lunch, what u gon eat ur keyboard lol

Still at McDonalds eh? It's OK. Somebody has to mop the floors.

rofl that somebody is my employee im the assistant manager bro i be shot callin big ballin u betta not be wanting double patties when u come callin thru my drive-thru windo, im smokin indo spitting on ur nuggets like it was babeque sauce

erictx?
 
Originally posted by: Imp
WPM is the biggest load of shit in the world. I took a typing test, got over 65 WPM (with backspacing and corrections) and got complimented. When I started working, I'd type at my regular, relaxed 30-40 WPM. Unless you're plagarizing books, what's the point? Even then, you could scan it nowadays.

it probably matters for dictation, but other than like court transcribers who use short-hand, who does dictation anymore?
 
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Imp
WPM is the biggest load of shit in the world. I took a typing test, got over 65 WPM (with backspacing and corrections) and got complimented. When I started working, I'd type at my regular, relaxed 30-40 WPM. Unless you're plagarizing books, what's the point? Even then, you could scan it nowadays.

it probably matters for dictation, but other than like court transcribers who use short-hand, who does dictation anymore?

I'm thinking that they don't want hunt and peckers (<~~LOL) who can't operate a keyboard.

 
I did data entry all through high school and some summer jobs during college (best jobs because of the ole walkman). At the headhunters they test you and I was doing 80ish at the time and they were shocked. Internet people can do 90+ spending so much time at the keyboard but of course it's more prominent these days than back in '95. I would guess that while you're behind the curve now, you're fine for what they need.
 
Originally posted by: Descartes
Per Wikipedia it looks like > 90 is fast.

I could type 140+wpm until the keyboard fell apart. I get comments on my typing speed all the time, but almost no one believes me when I tell them.

In my opinion, 80+ would be good. The real key is whether or not you can touch type. If you're a hunt-and-pecker or if you have to keep looking at the keyboard you're missing a lot of the value. You're best when you're not even thinking that you're typing, but that doesn't necessarily translate to WPM.

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

is not 140 words 😛 😉 😀 :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: Descartes
I could type 140+wpm until the keyboard fell apart. I get comments on my typing speed all the time, but almost no one believes me when I tell them.

Bullshit.

I believe it, I know I can type faster than I am right now if I practiced. I slow down at punctuation and numbers. I'm positive I could reach 140-150.
Hell, there were people on the old school web typing game TyperA (http://typera.tk/) that would destroy me, hitting 200+
 
Originally posted by: Descartes
Per Wikipedia it looks like > 90 is fast.

I could type 140+wpm until the keyboard fell apart. I get comments on my typing speed all the time, but almost no one believes me when I tell them.

In my opinion, 80+ would be good. The real key is whether or not you can touch type. If you're a hunt-and-pecker or if you have to keep looking at the keyboard you're missing a lot of the value. You're best when you're not even thinking that you're typing, but that doesn't necessarily translate to WPM.

I don't believe that you get 140+ consistently... unless you're using Dvorak. I'm sure you can hit 140WPM but how long you can keep it for... The world record is only around 150 consistently. I can hit about 120WPM consistently and up to 140+WPM for top speed. Although, your actual typing speed should be the speed you can type at and get about 98+% accuracy.

As for the OP's original question I would say that over 85WPM would be fast. I don't really know why you would need to be that fast though. And if you're talking about dictation you'll need to type about 150WPM to keep up with someone's speaking.
 
Back
Top