Originally posted by: Demoth
Not even some of the best rated and most popular PSUs on market supply more then 20A on the 12V rail, despite how many watts they are rated. And the recommended 38A for the crossfire means even fewer. Wonder how conservative ATI is being on the recommendation and if they are just going overboard to cover their bases and blame the PSU if anyone has a problem with the cards.
Well. for starters, just because a power supply is rated well and popular does not mean squat. A power supply could be "rated" well by a "reviewer" if it meets the basic "specs" given by the PS manufacturer and doesn't crash the reviewer's system while testing. And lots of PS' are "rated" by reviewers who aren't running power-hungry high-end videocards like the 7800GTX, 7900GTX, and X1900XT/X cards. Or even the last generation cards such as the 6800 Ultra and X800 XT/PE / X850 cards.
And unfortunately for consumers,
most PS companies use peak power output in their specifications as opposed to nomininal/sustained power. Peak power is typically at startup while the power supply and other components, i.e. CPU, GPU, hard drives, memory are cool. We all know that as components heat-up efficiency is lost.
Nominal power is what you should be looking at when spec'ing-out PS'. PC Power & Cooling uses power delivered with the PS at 50C for their published PS specifications. Peak power specs are at 25C. For instance, the PC P & C 510 ATX/510 ATX Deluxe/510 Express, and 510 SLI are rated at 510W (nominal/minimum/sustained) at 50C, while at 25C they provide 650W at maximum/peak.
ATI and Nvidia have to be conseravtive in their minimum PS ratings to "cover their bases" because, like others have said, not all power supplies are created equal. Again, most PS manufacturers use peak power as opposed to actual sustained power for the PS specs because it makes the PS look better than it really is. Effieciency also play a part in the sustained power output. They have to consider this, as well the fact that there are many cheap asses out there that will buy some crap PS trying to cut corners. Sorry if I sound elitist, but a spade is a spade and that is reality. My only dislike about the 510 Series is the 75% Efficiency. I have a 510 SLI and a 510 ATX Deluxe (same specs, just different connectors) and they are awesome but I have that one gripe, even though they power their respective systems 24/7 without a hiccup.
My main rig (see full system specs in my sig) uses a 510 SLI. I am powering 4 15K RPM SCSI hard drives and 2 opticals along with an FX-57, X1900XT-X and 2GB of memory. My 12V rail is 34A. I probably won't go Crossfire, since I usually upgrade my videocard every other generation or so, but if I want to go Crossfire I will step-up to the plate and buy a PC P & C 850SSI. And because the 850SSI (and the 1K also) are much longer than the 510 Series I'll have to buy a case with a deeper PS bay (V1200 maybe) in addition to an X1900 Crossfire Edition. So it won't be cheap for me either.
510 specs at a glance:
Output +5V @ 40A
+12V @ 34A/38A
-5V @ 0.3A
-12V @ 2A
+3.3V @ 30A
+5VSB @ 3A
Continous power = 510W
Peak power = 650W
Regulation (+3.3V, +5V, +12V) = 1%
Regulation (+5V, -12V) = 5%