How many more terms could FDR have served?

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
3
71
Had he not died..I mean coming off the brink of the most valiant war efforts ever, and dragging a country out of the great depression, was there anyone that could've provided competition, and prevent him from winning 5, 6, maybe even 7 terms? Given also of course that the 22nd amendment wouldn't have been passed at the time..
 

Cycad

Golden Member
Oct 18, 2000
1,406
0
0
He had already served 2 terms too many. FDR is given far too much credit for the things he did and now we are paying for it with a bloated government.
 

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
Originally posted by: Cycad
He had already served 2 terms too many. FDR is given far too much credit for the things he did and now we are paying for it with a bloated government.

yeah, not to wish bad things on people, but he should have died sooner (since he wasn't leaving office any other way)
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,855
4,967
136
Originally posted by: Cycad
He had already served 2 terms too many. FDR is given far too much credit for the things he did and now we are paying for it with a bloated government.





You lie.

 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
FDR was the right man for the time....That being said, I do think some of his social programs have contributed to the bloat of govt. we have today and that if he were to have continued in office the U.S. today would have a govt. much like that of Germany or France. Socialism would be out of control. Though I think Johnson and his Great Society was every bit as damaging, if not more so, than FDR's programs.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
alot considering the number of people on welfare would keep electing him.

Why was there no time limit for review?
 

Encryptic

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
8,885
0
0
I'm sure he would have either retired or a contender would have arisen to make a challenge for the presidency, had he not died first.
 

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
3
71
Originally posted by: Encryptic
I'm sure he would have either retired or a contender would have arisen to make a challenge for the presidency, had he not died first.

I don't know about that..no one came even CLOSE to beating FDR. I think in the last election the outcome was like 455 to 8 in the electoral college.
 

Encryptic

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
8,885
0
0
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: Encryptic
I'm sure he would have either retired or a contender would have arisen to make a challenge for the presidency, had he not died first.

I don't know about that..no one came even CLOSE to beating FDR. I think in the last election the outcome was like 455 to 8 in the electoral college.

Good point. I'm not as up to speed on this topic as I'd like. :(
 

Electric Amish

Elite Member
Oct 11, 1999
23,578
1
0
Originally posted by: Nitemare
alot considering the number of people on welfare would keep electing him.

Why was there no time limit for review?

Because we'd be having elections every 6 damn months.

As it stands it takes candidates a year to camapaign and make all their lie..er...promises and defame the competition.

amish