• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How many more terms could FDR have served?

Had he not died..I mean coming off the brink of the most valiant war efforts ever, and dragging a country out of the great depression, was there anyone that could've provided competition, and prevent him from winning 5, 6, maybe even 7 terms? Given also of course that the 22nd amendment wouldn't have been passed at the time..
 
He had already served 2 terms too many. FDR is given far too much credit for the things he did and now we are paying for it with a bloated government.
 
Originally posted by: Cycad
He had already served 2 terms too many. FDR is given far too much credit for the things he did and now we are paying for it with a bloated government.

yeah, not to wish bad things on people, but he should have died sooner (since he wasn't leaving office any other way)
 
Originally posted by: Cycad
He had already served 2 terms too many. FDR is given far too much credit for the things he did and now we are paying for it with a bloated government.





You lie.

 
FDR was the right man for the time....That being said, I do think some of his social programs have contributed to the bloat of govt. we have today and that if he were to have continued in office the U.S. today would have a govt. much like that of Germany or France. Socialism would be out of control. Though I think Johnson and his Great Society was every bit as damaging, if not more so, than FDR's programs.
 
alot considering the number of people on welfare would keep electing him.

Why was there no time limit for review?
 
I'm sure he would have either retired or a contender would have arisen to make a challenge for the presidency, had he not died first.
 
Originally posted by: Encryptic
I'm sure he would have either retired or a contender would have arisen to make a challenge for the presidency, had he not died first.

I don't know about that..no one came even CLOSE to beating FDR. I think in the last election the outcome was like 455 to 8 in the electoral college.
 
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: Encryptic
I'm sure he would have either retired or a contender would have arisen to make a challenge for the presidency, had he not died first.

I don't know about that..no one came even CLOSE to beating FDR. I think in the last election the outcome was like 455 to 8 in the electoral college.

Good point. I'm not as up to speed on this topic as I'd like. 🙁
 
Originally posted by: Nitemare
alot considering the number of people on welfare would keep electing him.

Why was there no time limit for review?

Because we'd be having elections every 6 damn months.

As it stands it takes candidates a year to camapaign and make all their lie..er...promises and defame the competition.

amish
 
Back
Top