• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How long will it be before Iraq is both stable and democratic?

V

vitoprimo

Member
3,136 people have voted so far (as of 5:17 PM ET)

12 months or less: 27 votes (1%)
Between one and five years: 653 votes (21%)
Between five and 10 years: 725 votes (23%)
Iraq won't be stable and democratic in the next decade: 1731 votes (55%)

Not a particularly auspicious prediction from one of the more economically conservative communities.
 
Aren't we spending like $7,000,000,000 every 30 days there

Seems like Osama is smarter than Bush.. saying he wanted to bankrupt the US
 
LOL

I vote for Iraq the war part III in 2011, this time they join Iran and have real WMDs and they start it.
 
online polls are hardly scientific and are known to be subject to various things like getting posted in wickedly partisan forums which throw the results off one way or another.
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
Aren't we spending like $7,000,000,000 every 30 days there
Click to expand...
Oh gosh no. Andy Rooney says we're spending only $5,600,000,000 every month. You know he's got his facts straight. After all, he works for CBS.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
online polls are hardly scientific and are known to be subject to various things like getting posted in wickedly partisan forums which throw the results off one way or another.
Click to expand...
I agree. I guess I was expecting the WSJ crowd to be more in sync with the current administration's expectation for speedy results in Iraq. I was shocked at the poll results.
 
Originally posted by: vitoprimo
Originally posted by: ElFenix
online polls are hardly scientific and are known to be subject to various things like getting posted in wickedly partisan forums which throw the results off one way or another.
Click to expand...
I agree. I guess I was expecting the WSJ crowd to be more in sync with the current administration's expectation for speedy results in Iraq. I was shocked at the poll results.
Click to expand...

You know you're too conservative when even the WSJ readers disagree with you 😉
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top