How Is Your System Handling UT 2004 Demo?

[olds]

Originally posted by: Derango
ok, I have to revise my post 🙂

AMD Athlon64 3000+
1GB of PC3200 ram
Sapphire Radeon 9800Pro 128MB
1152x864 @ 70-90 FPS with 4X AA and 16X AF on with all graphical options on the highest they'll go

It can drop lower if, in onslaught mode there's 6 players with vehicles in the canyon area. However, its pretty stable FPSwise in every other situation.

It hits 200 on the black screen between levels though 😉

Where are you changing AA?

 

[xcript]

40-60 FPS @ 1024x768/medium-high detail (no AA/AF) on an XP1800+ @ 2GHz / 512MB PC2700 / 128MB Radeon 9100 @ 275/250.

 

[The Sauce]

I have been running my 1700+ @ 2200 for a year now, no problems. UT2004 crashed it repeatedly...had to back down to 2100. Now runing great. 9800Pro also.

 

[Maleficus]

2800+ 512 ram, 9800

1280x1024 32 bit 80% settings on high

plays flawlessly

 

[jinduy]

i get 20-22 fps on my gf2 gts-v, but it seems to run pretty buttery good for me at max settings (AA off, 1024x768).

 

[InlineFive]

Originally posted by: marleymarl
barton 2500, 9600 pro, 512mb 400mhz ram is giving me about 65 fps with details on high.

 

[rh71]

As previously mentioned, I'm on a 1GHz 384MB PC133 and GF3 ti200.

If I upgrade my RAM to at least 512MB and get a 9800 Pro, would that be good enough to reach the 40fps+ mark ? I'm only getting 15fps right now.

 

[ndee]

just ok on my work P4-2.4GHz with a GF4MX440, 512MB RAM. It runs on 800x600 barely well and it stutters on 1024x768.

 

[TwiceOver]

Three Systems all Fine:

AMD 1.4 Tbird Ti200 Vid card 128mb
AMD 2400+ Radeon 9700 Pro 128mb
AMD 2500+ It4200 64mb

All three of these systems ran just great! Also ran "ok" on a 2500+ w/ Onboard GF4 MX

 

[StageLeft]

A hell of a lot better than Far Cry, which I can't even play.

Barton 2500+ (it will be oced when I get a chance), geforce 3 (currently...still tweaking how high it can go with OCing), 512 ram. I play at 1024X768X16 with low to medium settings and my frame rate seems to be 40-70 depending on level and what's going on. I need a new vid card I guess, although UT2k4 is perfectly playable and enjoyable.

 

[hans007]

i have tried it on my system but not really played much due to not having time.

but it runs very smooth for me on a athlon 64 3000 , 512mb pc3500 and geforce 5950 (its not the card i normally used but i had a box of them and had to try it out). seems like an excellent game, and reminds me of the original UT (which was better than the little of UT2003 i played).

 

[Megatomic]

It handles better than UT2K3 did. I can't wait for my SE DVD set to come in.

1152x864x32
4xAA/4xAF
details as high as game will allow
details max in NV control panel

Lowest FPS I've seen with ingame counter is in the upper 50s. Very playable.

 

[LordJezo]

Originally posted by: rh71
As previously mentioned, I'm on a 1GHz 384MB PC133 and GF3 ti200.

If I upgrade my RAM to at least 512MB and get a 9800 Pro, would that be good enough to reach the 40fps+ mark ? I'm only getting 15fps right now.

You will be wasting your money.

a 9800 pro on a 1ghz chip is useless. sort of like having a car that can do 180 mile per hour but only driving it on roads with speed limits of 40mph.

your cpu will be that speed limit and your 9800 pro will be that sports car. unless you upgrade your cpu you wont take advantage of it.

heck.. my cpu is 2x your speed and i cant even push that card to its limits.

save your money and just get a geforce 4 or something.