• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How is this girl a 6.9? =AT Effect Boosts Girl's Self Esteem - Now a 9.1=

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
That girl is simply beautiful,young,fresh faced and healthy looking,bonus points for nice smile and beautiful hair🙂

THIS girl is simply beautiful

Honey,when you get to be my age ALL younger women are simply beautiful

I bet you're still one up on them in the inner beauty category though 😉

(no, I'm not hitting on you... 🙂 )

Well screw "inner beauty" all that gets you is shiat on

Not true. I give props to the following 'other' attributes:

1)intelligence
2)humor
3)compassion

those are all a part of inner beauty.

of course the following 'other' attributes exist as well:

1)Financial status (i don't believe a woman should be from a background 10% wealthier or 10% poorer than my own)
2) Computer knowledge and acceptance of technology
3) Car she drives
4) compatibility






But.. if she has big boobs, a tight waste, and a nice face i guess that'll do just fine. 😉

j/k
 
Originally posted by: InverseOfNeo
Shes a 6.9 for one reason.....shes no older than 16, 'nuff said.

HotOrNot is not a rating for "I would definitely do the deed with them". It's as simple as: Hot or not?

I mix cute/hot together because there are many cute women who I don't think are 'hot', but I find more desirable. Rating this person highly doesn't mean you want to make love to them. It means that you find them cute/hot. You are not perverted for rating somebody who appears to be 16 years old higher than somebody who might be 30. If you find a problem in this, it has something to do with you personally.

I find many women who are famous very attractive, but I would NEVER consider ever being with them in a relationship. Some people really need to grow up.

-silver
 
The notion of quantifying beauty is ludicris to begin with. Different cultures and societies all have different notions of what's more beautiful. Some like heavier ladies, some like harrier ladies, some like made up ladies, etc. Beauty truly is in the eye of the beholder, there is no absolute standard for it. Beauty is also relative to how well you know the person, even the most homely of geek like most of us 🙂D) somehow manages to find affection, unless of course we use aesthetics or financial status as a primary criteria in seeking the opposite sex ourselves, which I think is the problem with a lot of the posters in this thread.
 
Originally posted by: BatmanNate
The notion of quantifying beauty is ludicris to begin with. Different cultures and societies all have different notions of what's more beautiful. Some like heavier ladies, some like harrier ladies, some like made up ladies, etc. Beauty truly is in the eye of the beholder, there is no absolute standard for it. Beauty is also relative to how well you know the person, even the most homely of geek like most of us 🙂D) somehow manages to find affection, unless of course we use aesthetics or financial status as a primary criteria in seeking the opposite sex ourselves, which I think is the problem with a lot of the posters in this thread.

That's true, but I can still rate girls according to my own standards!
 
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
Originally posted by: BatmanNate
The notion of quantifying beauty is ludicris to begin with. Different cultures and societies all have different notions of what's more beautiful. Some like heavier ladies, some like harrier ladies, some like made up ladies, etc. Beauty truly is in the eye of the beholder, there is no absolute standard for it. Beauty is also relative to how well you know the person, even the most homely of geek like most of us 🙂D) somehow manages to find affection, unless of course we use aesthetics or financial status as a primary criteria in seeking the opposite sex ourselves, which I think is the problem with a lot of the posters in this thread.

That's true, but I can still rate girls according to my own standards!


Mosty definately, but it just makes the entire score moot since everyone is rating according to different standards. 🙂
 
Glad to see the AT Effect kicking in with the original girl in question. 🙂

Also glad to see no one asked for "Pics?" 😀
 
Back
Top