- Jan 8, 2002
- 1,155
- 0
- 76
Example 1: ADATA Ultimate SU800 3D TLC NAND SSD
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10601...800-ssd-smi-controller-3d-nand-sata-interface
says
Thanks to higher endurance of 3D TLC NAND compared to planar flash memory made using thin process technologies, ADATA declares 2 million hours MTBF..." (Mean time between failures).
Example 2: Toshiba Q300 Pro MLC SSD
http://us.toshiba.com/storage/internal/ssd
1.5 million hours MTBF (Mean time between failures).
So in real life what does a claim of
3D TLC NAND being 2 million hours MBTF
vs
MLC NAND being 1.5 million hours MBTF
mean?
TLC is by definition less reliable than MLC.
3D TLC NAND is better than TLC but is the claim than 3D TLC is more reliable than MLC exaggerated in the example of those two drives...
How does ADATA's 3D TLC NAND compare to Toshiba's MLC NAND in real life?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10601...800-ssd-smi-controller-3d-nand-sata-interface
says
Thanks to higher endurance of 3D TLC NAND compared to planar flash memory made using thin process technologies, ADATA declares 2 million hours MTBF..." (Mean time between failures).
Example 2: Toshiba Q300 Pro MLC SSD
http://us.toshiba.com/storage/internal/ssd
1.5 million hours MTBF (Mean time between failures).
So in real life what does a claim of
3D TLC NAND being 2 million hours MBTF
vs
MLC NAND being 1.5 million hours MBTF
mean?
TLC is by definition less reliable than MLC.
3D TLC NAND is better than TLC but is the claim than 3D TLC is more reliable than MLC exaggerated in the example of those two drives...
How does ADATA's 3D TLC NAND compare to Toshiba's MLC NAND in real life?