How important is L2 Cache??

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
Originally posted by: filterxg
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/print/sempron-2600.html

It's a couple of months old but the results surprise me. I always thought that for some things like gaming and video encoding L2 makes a huge difference. Video encoding being the most important CPU intensive process I do.

Did I just waste $15 going with a Sempron 3100 rather than a Semp 3000??

Yea, I am sure that $15 is going to send you into financial ruin. While it doesn't make a huge difference, it is a positive difference.
 

Chode Messiah

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2005
1,634
0
0
Originally posted by: classy

Yea, I am sure that $15 is going to send you into financial ruin. While it doesn't make a huge difference, it is a positive difference.[/quote]


classy is defintiely right. It's worth 15 bucks and it's not like it's gonna make you file for bankruptcy:shocked:
 

sangyup81

Golden Member
Feb 22, 2005
1,082
1
81
there might be a chance that the 256k cache versions overclock better due to some speed binning so it's probably not a waste
 

MegaWorks

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
3,819
1
0
Originally posted by: Chode Messiah
Originally posted by: classy

Yea, I am sure that $15 is going to send you into financial ruin. While it doesn't make a huge difference, it is a positive difference.


classy is defintiely right. It's worth 15 bucks and it's not like it's gonna make you file for bankruptcy:shocked:
[/quote]

Your Rig is crazy! :thumbsup:
 

CheesePoofs

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2004
3,163
0
0
Originally posted by: sangyup81
there might be a chance that the 256k cache versions overclock better due to some speed binning so it's probably not a waste

How would that work?
 

Avalon

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2001
7,572
182
106
Theoretically they could overclock a smidget better due to having less cache.