How Howard Dean Got So Angry

MonstaThrilla

Golden Member
Sep 16, 2000
1,652
0
0
NY Press

[...]

When you watch a presidential election campaign up close, as I have for the last five months, you start to realize that the actual people running in the race are irrelevant to the results. Instead, the race is an exercise in corporate storytelling, in which the mass media?in a committee-like process that evolves over time through trial and error?settles on a storyline and then drags the rest of the country along for the ride, all the way through to November.

I had a front-row seat for this process. Though there were rumblings on the "angry" front before?most notably in a June piece by Matt Bai in the New York Times magazine that concluded by wondering aloud if Dean?s "angry message" might not be his downfall?the real launch of the "angry" theme came in the dual cover stories in Time and Newsweek that appeared simultaneously in early August.

Both Newsweek?s Jonathan Alter and Time?s Karen Tumulty?using language suspiciously similar to that of earlier Democratic Leadership Council memos about the burgeoning Dean disaster?focused heavily on the "anger" theme, openly concluding that the chief "problem" of Dean?s candidacy would be convincing voters to get past his "anger," "testiness" and "pugnacity."

[...]

The Time-Newsweek covers came at a key moment in the Dean candidacy, just before Dean?s "Sleepless Summer Tour." This was Dean?s media coming-out party, in which he brought some three dozen or more prominent journalists around the country with him on a chartered plane and gave them all intimate access for four consecutive days.

I was on that plane, and I can report that the "angry" issue (as well as the "journalists hate Dean" issue) was something that was much discussed among the journalists. Mostly we thought it didn?t make too much sense. With us reporters on the plane, Dean was never anything but congenial and accommodating. And in his speeches and public appearances, he presented the full gamut of emotions. I think I speak for a lot of the reporters in saying that had I not just read the Fineman and Tumulty pieces, I would?nt have been aware that he was any angrier than any other candidate running for office. Christ, Dick Gephardt by comparison is a raving lunatic: waving his finger all the time and screeching, "Bush is a miserable failure!" with that creepy mask-like face of his. The only difference is, Gephardt?s speaking in front of 10 people.

Nonetheless, because of the Time-Newsweek stories, a large percentage of the reporters on the Dean plane felt that they had to at least address the "angry" issue. And so a great many of us talked about Dean having the reputation for an angry public style, and this focus frequently came at the expense of actually explaining to readers what Dean?s positions were.

I wonder how long this will last. It already seems to be waning as the primaries approach and real news will be made. The grassroots can only deliver Dean the primaries for now. How Dean is portrayed during the General Election by the media is up to how Dean handles himself from now on. If its anything close to a truthful representation of the man and his policies, then the grassroots will be able to deliver him the November election as well.
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
I thought he "go so angry" to tap into the "we are so angry" constituency no? This sure looked good on paper, but when 35% of Americans are angry, it appears he?s a few fries short of a 'happy meal.'
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
The media is run by huge multinationals like ge/nbc etc all of whom have conservative economic agendas. This is why the media completly ignores corporate welfare, cripleing debt, pro-labor and pro-consumer issues which is hurting every american. Frankly I think the democracy is broken when all they push is the free-trade/gobalization/interventionist foreign policy line. Then they play divide and concur with issues like guns/god/gays/AA to get our minds off the real issues. If dean runs a populist candidicy the media will kill him.
 

MonstaThrilla

Golden Member
Sep 16, 2000
1,652
0
0
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Blaming the media?:p

CkG

For harping on one facet of his standard stump speech and ignoring his plans on economic recovery, fiscal responsibility, universal healthcare, better education, and sane foreign policy? Yes I am then.
 

MonstaThrilla

Golden Member
Sep 16, 2000
1,652
0
0
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
I thought he "go so angry" to tap into the "we are so angry" constituency no? This sure looked good on paper, but when 35% of Americans are angry, it appears he?s a few fries short of a 'happy meal.'

First off, that "few fries short of a happy meal" joke is used to describe people who are dumb, not political strategery.

Secondly, if you bothered to read the article and think with an open mind, you'd see that the point the author was trying to make was that the Dean=anger persona the media loves to harp on is inaccurate and misleading.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
You guys remember when media protrayed Bush Sr. as angry when he had a legit thyroid condition? I think this combined with perot killed Bush. Plus they portrayed Perot as a lunatic...well he may have been. :p
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
I thought he "go so angry" to tap into the "we are so angry" constituency no? This sure looked good on paper, but when 35% of Americans are angry, it appears he?s a few fries short of a 'happy meal.'

First off, that "few fries short of a happy meal" joke is used to describe people who are dumb, not political strategery.

Thanks for telling me how to use "jokes." You probably want to tell me what to do with my disposable income, too?



 

burnedout

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,249
2
0
Originally posted by: Zebo
You guys remember when media protrayed Bush Sr. as angry when he had a legit thyroid condition? I think this combined with perot killed Bush. Plus they portrayed Perot as a lunatic...well he may have been. :p
Perot had some issues, no doubt. However, what really bothered me the most about the Perot campaign was the attempted intellectual assassination on Admiral Stockdale by some in the media. In Admiral Stockdale, Perot had one of the leading scholars and stoics of our time.

Unfortunately, Admiral Stockdale isn't a politician, but rather more connected with academia. In my opinion, the debate between the three VP candidates (Stockdale, Quayle and Gore) was a political sham resulting in two comparatively young hustlers against a dignified, elderly gentleman. I once read an interview in which Admiral Stockdale admitted that he had not adequately prepared for the debate because of the short notice.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: burnedout
Originally posted by: Zebo
You guys remember when media protrayed Bush Sr. as angry when he had a legit thyroid condition? I think this combined with perot killed Bush. Plus they portrayed Perot as a lunatic...well he may have been. :p
Perot had some issues, no doubt. However, what really bothered me the most about the Perot campaign was the attempted intellectual assassination on Admiral Stockdale by some in the media. In Admiral Stockdale, Perot had one of the leading scholars and stoics of our time.

Unfortunately, Admiral Stockdale isn't a politician, but rather more connected with academia. In my opinion, the debate between the three VP candidates (Stockdale, Quayle and Gore) was a political sham resulting in two comparatively young hustlers against a dignified, elderly gentleman. I once read an interview in which Admiral Stockdale admitted that he had not adequately prepared for the debate because of the short notice.

Ya Michael Moore interview of heston comes to mind there. Total lack of respect and the snikering arrrr. Maybe we don't deserve anyone decent since craps what sells.

PS I think perot was a great man with getting his people out of Iran (did you read "where eagles dare"?) plus his POW/MIA stuff.
 

Spencer278

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 2002
3,637
0
0
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
I thought he "go so angry" to tap into the "we are so angry" constituency no? This sure looked good on paper, but when 35% of Americans are angry, it appears he?s a few fries short of a 'happy meal.'

First off, that "few fries short of a happy meal" joke is used to describe people who are dumb, not political strategery.

Thanks for telling me how to use "jokes." You probably want to tell me what to do with my disposable income, too?

you can start by send it to me and I will mange it for you becuase you clear suck at it.
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: Spencer278

you can start by send it to me and I will mange it for you becuase you clear suck at it.

Typical liberal response; you know what to do WITH THE MONEY I EARN more than the person who earned it..."send it to me!" How fitting.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: Spencer278

you can start by send it to me and I will mange it for you becuase you clear suck at it.

Typical liberal response; you know what to do WITH THE MONEY I EARN more than the person who earned it..."send it to me!" How fitting.

Isn't that what the government does?
 

burnedout

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,249
2
0
Originally posted by: Zebo

Ya Michael Moore interview of heston comes to mind there. Total lack of respect and the snikering arrrr. Maybe we don't deserve anyone decent since craps what sells.

PS I think perot was a great man with getting his people out of Iran (did you read "where eagles dare"?) plus his POW/MIA stuff.
Oh yes. Perot has had some really great accomplishments. The rescue of his EDS employees in Iran was awesome.