- Feb 5, 2011
- 13,306
- 3
- 0
Sometimes I hear of people going 50k on a set of tires and I burn through them in half that time on average (and not even driving aggressively). My current car came with tires that claim a 5 year/65,000 warranty and considering their tread life expectancy is rated 360 there's no way in all hell this will ever happen. Just this fall I replaced tires that were 17,000 miles old and almost worn out (rated at 260, they were worthless OEM tires).
I presume that, as long as the wear is even and I have proof of rotations, if these are burned to crap at 32,500 I get 50% of tire cost covered. I've never tried tire warranty claims in the past as it just seemed a hassle.
------
Also, why do people say rotating tires extends their life? I know they even out the wear to keep handling consistent (e.g. less fishtailing risk if bald rears), but vehicle performance aside, I have never understood the apparent notion behind this. It seems to me if you had a FWD car and almost ran its front tires down and then finally swapped with rear so that the old-rear are now the front and wear them down you'll end up with four worn down tires at the same point in time as if you had rotated every 5k
I presume that, as long as the wear is even and I have proof of rotations, if these are burned to crap at 32,500 I get 50% of tire cost covered. I've never tried tire warranty claims in the past as it just seemed a hassle.
------
Also, why do people say rotating tires extends their life? I know they even out the wear to keep handling consistent (e.g. less fishtailing risk if bald rears), but vehicle performance aside, I have never understood the apparent notion behind this. It seems to me if you had a FWD car and almost ran its front tires down and then finally swapped with rear so that the old-rear are now the front and wear them down you'll end up with four worn down tires at the same point in time as if you had rotated every 5k