- Nov 9, 2013
- 1,469
- 407
- 136
It would be practically impossible to build. The half-life of some of those elements is just too short. By the time you built it, it would no longer contain what you wanted it to contain. Read the table caption here:
You know that isn't gonna deter him. He will read about all the stuff that says how the radiation isn't that harmful in minute amounts and get a real radioactive periodic table from a chinese or russian seller anyway. I just hope that he keeps that periodic table a safe distance away from his little bags of "future gizmo baby" seeds. The world needs more gizmos.chernobyl level of harmful
The Libyans!You should do it. Please let us know how you obtain your Plutonium.
Wouldn't it be safe behind glass?
Nope, I am no physicist. I know there are certain ridiculously radioactive substances out there. I would guess they’d be dangerous in a small amount to anyone living even remotely close to you.It's not like people are going to eat it!
Wouldn't it be safe behind glass?
The leaded glass at the Hanford reprocessing canyons was three feet thick. This was to stop radiation from exposed fuel rods after they cooled down a bit.It's not like people are going to eat it!
Wouldn't it be safe behind glass?
Yeah. Watch any nuclear disaster movie.
Hell, watch the HBO mini series Chernobyl. I watched I think just two episodes and couldn't watch more. It was HORRIFYING!