Originally posted by: Phil
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
Mine's not FDA-approved as it's considered a lethal weapon
That's because it's red, irritated, swolen, puss covered, and glows green under black light.
That's because it's red, irritated, swolen, puss covered, and glows green under black light.
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Phil
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
Mine's not FDA-approved as it's considered a lethal weapon
That's because it's red, irritated, swolen, puss covered, and glows green under black light.
Since when were we talking about you? 
If that were true, the most common size would be 10", and I'd have an 11" . The size survey linked in other threads found no correlation to foot size, but found a STRONG correlation to hand and nose size.
In college, some friends and I made a HUGE clay penis. It was beyond porn-star dimensions and then some. Another girl in our quad came in and we were laughing about its size and she said "that's big????" She had only had one boyfriend, this very skinny, very, very nerdy guy named Rick that she was still dating. We all just got really quiet and then every time we saw him after that we just could not contain our laughter.
Maybe you are Rick and just don't know it
DainBramaged
Lifer
- Jun 19, 2003
- 23,454
- 41
- 91
DainBramaged
Lifer
- Jun 19, 2003
- 23,454
- 41
- 91
Kerouactivist
Diamond Member
- Jul 12, 2001
- 4,665
- 0
- 76
HumblePie
Lifer
- Oct 30, 2000
- 14,665
- 440
- 126
I remember trojan sponsoring a scientific measurement survey a few years back. The study was done by inviting random men ages 18-55 to measure just about everything on them trying to find corrolations between body shapes, sizes, ethnicity, and age demographics. I remember the results very clearly because you wouldn't believe how often these myths come up around friends and in casual conversations. I beleive the sample size was something like 1.5 million men around the country of the USA (making certain others note this). Many were invited to doctor offices, but most men were asked randomly outside of popular night clubs for a 15 minute measurement survey.
OF all body parts measured besides the penis, which include the head, arms, foot, toes, legs, hands, fingers, and nose, only ONE body part had a TINY corrolation of 11%. It was the left thumb. Everything else was 1.5% or lower in corrolation. So a guy with a big left thumb has a 11% likely chance to have an ABOVE average penis size. That's it.
For those wondering about other results...
The biggest "average" was held by white men at 150 millimeters (6 inches) that are between the ages of 21 and 25. Before that age 18-20, the average for a white male is around 148mm , and the size shrunk as the adult male aged over 25. This also corrolates to the average testostorone level found in males decreasing after age 25 continually until death.
The second largest ethnic demographic was african-americans at 147mm between the same age ranges.
The smallest average was asian males at 124mm.
Measurements were taken from fully erect males with a tape measure by measuring from the longest tip of the penis to the base without pressing down on the pubic mound of skin. The only demographics without a sizeable amount to include in the study were Pacific Islanders.
What was interesting to note was the flaccid states of measurements. Caucasian males on average were around 75mm when flaccid, asian males were around 72mm, and african-americans were 108mm when flaccid. Which is more often then not what promotes that african-americans are "hung" when infact they just look larger in the locker room but actually aren't.
There WERE extremes found in all races with penises over the 300mm for almost all races, and penises under 25mm when erect.
Other interesting correlations to note are that most men (57%) with larger flaccid states don't "grow" as much, hence the average size. Also, an overwhelming amount of men in the survey (92%) hung to the left. As in the penis tended to point more to the left side of the body then the right side or straight down the middle. Most men (95%) were bent at an angle, either right or left, with that remainder 5% having a perfectly straight rod. The other obvious note was that most men surveyed were circumcised (in america duh) so no relevant statistical data about men that were not cut could be taken. The last statistical inference, which means it wasn't a statistical note of this study but it is when compared to another, is that a study sponsored back in the 1960's with the same measurements, but a smaller sample size of around 500,000 men, found that the average "biggest" male was caucasians at 146mm. Which infers that the average penis size has been steadily increasing over the decades.
So for men, you can't judge a book by it's cover at all. You need to pull the shorts down and make him happy to get any real idea of what you are going to get.
OF all body parts measured besides the penis, which include the head, arms, foot, toes, legs, hands, fingers, and nose, only ONE body part had a TINY corrolation of 11%. It was the left thumb. Everything else was 1.5% or lower in corrolation. So a guy with a big left thumb has a 11% likely chance to have an ABOVE average penis size. That's it.
For those wondering about other results...
The biggest "average" was held by white men at 150 millimeters (6 inches) that are between the ages of 21 and 25. Before that age 18-20, the average for a white male is around 148mm , and the size shrunk as the adult male aged over 25. This also corrolates to the average testostorone level found in males decreasing after age 25 continually until death.
The second largest ethnic demographic was african-americans at 147mm between the same age ranges.
The smallest average was asian males at 124mm.
Measurements were taken from fully erect males with a tape measure by measuring from the longest tip of the penis to the base without pressing down on the pubic mound of skin. The only demographics without a sizeable amount to include in the study were Pacific Islanders.
What was interesting to note was the flaccid states of measurements. Caucasian males on average were around 75mm when flaccid, asian males were around 72mm, and african-americans were 108mm when flaccid. Which is more often then not what promotes that african-americans are "hung" when infact they just look larger in the locker room but actually aren't.
There WERE extremes found in all races with penises over the 300mm for almost all races, and penises under 25mm when erect.
Other interesting correlations to note are that most men (57%) with larger flaccid states don't "grow" as much, hence the average size. Also, an overwhelming amount of men in the survey (92%) hung to the left. As in the penis tended to point more to the left side of the body then the right side or straight down the middle. Most men (95%) were bent at an angle, either right or left, with that remainder 5% having a perfectly straight rod. The other obvious note was that most men surveyed were circumcised (in america duh) so no relevant statistical data about men that were not cut could be taken. The last statistical inference, which means it wasn't a statistical note of this study but it is when compared to another, is that a study sponsored back in the 1960's with the same measurements, but a smaller sample size of around 500,000 men, found that the average "biggest" male was caucasians at 146mm. Which infers that the average penis size has been steadily increasing over the decades.
So for men, you can't judge a book by it's cover at all. You need to pull the shorts down and make him happy to get any real idea of what you are going to get.
I wear 13's too. Speak for yourself
I'm not claiming it's accurate for all. It's just a family joke (something my mother in law told my wife when we were first dating...)TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 20K
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter