• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How does this compare to the FX?

Not only does it beat the GF-FX in the benchs (pretty convincingly) with it's O/C'd core, it doesn't sound like a DustBuster and is available NOW.

Pretty good signs pointing to the R350 refresh of the 9700Pro as being a GF-FX "killer".
 
Originally posted by: apoppin
Not only does it beat the GF-FX in the benchs (pretty convincingly) with it's O/C'd core, it doesn't sound like a DustBuster and is available NOW.

Pretty good signs pointing to the R350 refresh of the 9700Pro as being a GF-FX "killer".

Can you post some benches to compare? I'm too lazy to do so...
 
Un no . . . I am extrapolating.

Let's say that the GF-FX DustBuster is 10% faster than the Radeon 9700Pro . . .

. . . The Tachyon with it's O/C'd 370 / 340 MHz was generally 10% or faster than the regular Pro . . . SO . . .

😉
 
Back
Top