Pootems, do you think this picture describes the situation accurately?
Originally posted by: drpootums
Originally posted by: jjzelinski
Originally posted by: assemblage
Being against same sex marriages does not mean somone's a homophobe.Originally posted by: qarlandZ
Gay marriage hurt me because it gave the homophobes in Ohio and Florida an incentive to vote... thus re-electing MOFO Bush
What does it mean? You think homosexuality is deviant, a virus that must be stopped. Does that not sound like a hate mongering sentiment?
I'm against queer marrage, and i'm not a homophobe. I'm not afraid of them, i just hate their sin.
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Pootems, do you think this picture describes the situation accurately?
Originally posted by: drpootums
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Pootems, do you think this picture describes the situation accurately?
I dont think it describes anything. Do you think it describes the situation well? If so, please tell me how it does.
Originally posted by: drpootums
I understood it...ok, if you are driving on the left side of the road it may be ok for a while, but sooner or later you are going to crash and burn (go to hell).
And you call someone else's argument pathetic?Originally posted by: drpootums
I'm against queer marrage, and i'm not a homophobe. I'm not afraid of them, i just hate their sin.Originally posted by: jjzelinski
What does it mean? You think homosexuality is deviant, a virus that must be stopped. Does that not sound like a hate mongering sentiment?Originally posted by: assemblage
Being against same sex marriages does not mean somone's a homophobe.Originally posted by: qarlandZ
Gay marriage hurt me because it gave the homophobes in Ohio and Florida an incentive to vote... thus re-electing MOFO Bush
Originally posted by: cquark
Marriage is a legal contract, like any other. Banning same sex marriage violates the right of equal protection in legal contracts based on gender in the same way that banning interracial marriages violates equal protection based on race, so yes the 14th amendment is violated by banning same sex marriage.
Amendment XIV
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Originally posted by: awesomet
Just a question...why are we debating gay marriage in a tech forum? Also why are some of you so defensive about it?
Originally posted by: awesomet
Just a question...why are we debating gay marriage in a tech forum? Also why are some of you so defensive about it?
Originally posted by: polm
Originally posted by: ntdz
they don't hurt me. how does some inner city kid not having health insurance hurt you? It's the same thing.
what kind of analogy is that ?
I'm not voting to ban healthcare for inner city youth.
Originally posted by: Genesys
Originally posted by: cquark
Marriage is a legal contract, like any other. Banning same sex marriage violates the right of equal protection in legal contracts based on gender in the same way that banning interracial marriages violates equal protection based on race, so yes the 14th amendment is violated by banning same sex marriage.
Amendment XIV
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
that is the fourteenth amendment, please point out to me where it mentions anything about legal contracts. it mentions public DEBT, but nothing about contracts.
nice try, but do try again.
Originally posted by: cquark
It's right there in Section I, "equal protection of laws," which includes legal contracts. As long as the government permits legal contracts, it cannot discriminated based on gender or race in allowing them.
Originally posted by: MiStErBRoc
in my opinion gay marriage is fine EXCEPT when there is a child involved... before i get flammed please hear me out lol im not saying because someone is gay that they cant love there child thats not true in alot of cases they love them more but being i know a few people who are gay and have kids in there relationship it made life for the kid abit hard being when children are young they dont understand things like that and they get bothered and picked on in school and outside for having different parents... i know life in general is hard but i just feel its kinda bad to make a child go threw that without even giving them the choice of it.... maybe im wrong maybe some people agree
Originally posted by: MiStErBRoc
in my opinion gay marriage is fine EXCEPT when there is a child involved... before i get flammed please hear me out lol im not saying because someone is gay that they cant love there child thats not true in alot of cases they love them more but being i know a few people who are gay and have kids in there relationship it made life for the kid abit hard being when children are young they dont understand things like that and they get bothered and picked on in school and outside for having different parents... i know life in general is hard but i just feel its kinda bad to make a child go threw that without even giving them the choice of it.... maybe im wrong maybe some people agree
A long time ago, Joey and Michael were seeing the same woman, Marcia Bradford. Soon, Maricia was pregnant with Nicole but died shortly after giving birth. Unable to determine who the father was, both Michael and Joey were appointed Nicole's legal guardians.
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: polm
Originally posted by: drpootums
keeping myself from sin? Didnt i just say that in Gods eye's i am without sin. I am forgiven, and trying to put my beliefs on these forums i dont see as a sin.
Sharing your beleifs is fine and good.
Forcing your beleifs via law is not fine nor good.
So then quit forcing your belief that I must accept gay marriage. It works both ways..... I'm really tired of hearing that it doesn't by those who'd like to slide by. It is not going to happen.
Originally posted by: zaphod42
How does gay marriage help you? Every gay person that I know could give two craps over this, it is the ones who hate the religious right that is pushing this issue. I would bet my left testicle that the ones who are pushing this the hardest aren't gay at all, just can't get a date.
Originally posted by: cquark
Originally posted by: zaphod42
How does gay marriage help you? Every gay person that I know could give two craps over this, it is the ones who hate the religious right that is pushing this issue. I would bet my left testicle that the ones who are pushing this the hardest aren't gay at all, just can't get a date.
I know a lot of gay couples who have been together for decades and who have gone to Canada, Massachusetts, Oregon, or wherever would get them married. They all cared.