sdifox
No Lifer
I don't buy movies because they are overpriced. I also rarely want to watch one more than once.
New release blu-rays should be $3. Older movis on blu-ray should be $1-2.
That doesn't even cover the fuel cost.
I don't buy movies because they are overpriced. I also rarely want to watch one more than once.
New release blu-rays should be $3. Older movis on blu-ray should be $1-2.
If you meet the viewing distance/size of screen for telling the difference between DVD and Blu-ray, I would get Blu-ray for any modern action movie or documentary or any film where visuals play a key role. Favorite movies of mine (like LOTR - Extended version when it comes out) I would not hesitate to get on Blu-ray, and "Reference" quality Blu-rays I would strongly consider getting (see PQ thread on AVS forums).
You don't entertain much do you?
I use a very simple formula. Is the movie visual and FX driven? I go Blu. Is it story and character driven, with little CGI or epic vistas? I go DVD.
Why would that matter? In every way possible the Blu-ray is going to be better.
It's like asking would you rather have a decent cheeseburger for next three meals or prime rib for one and go hungry for the next two.
If you've got a fixed movie budget then you have to pick and chose how to spread it out. There's just some movies that don't get the same bump in visual/audio enjoyment that others do. Save money on it them and get more movies overall.