How couldn't it be Romney/Rand in 2016?

[Anarchist420]

That's like trying to drink whiskey from a bottle of wine.

What's moderate? We need independent-thinking leaders, not "moderate" ones. Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton were both moderates; Bush was a moderate overall (he actually was pretty pro-abortion as TX governor) and on foreign policy before he saw the damage on the night of 9/11/01. Rand Paul and Ben Carson are the most dangerous extremists. Ron Paul, Obama, and Newt are more independent although Ron Paul would've experienced extreme internal conflict trying to balance liberty and the rule of law. That is why no one like him will ever be President of the united States. The Rational-designed Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution disallowed femininity in Presidential office; Idealists are good at helping others directly. Idealistic leaders are usually unelected philosophical rulers (like ENFP Hitler who got fucked up by the State that made him as well as by his bureaucratic dad; Hitler was ultimately value free) and serve themselves if they can even survive the revolution they lead. Che Guevara couldn't win the revolution unlike his idealistic fellow "comrade" Castro. If only Thomas Woodrow Wilson had never become President then I wouldn't be here and no difference could be known. I am guessing Theodore Roosevelt again would've sucked but also was less harmful than Bill Howard Taft and Wilsonian democracy.