• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How could you be this retarded?

a woman...that makes sense. jk. what kind of an idiot bring a gun to work? for what purpose? that's what sounds fishy to me.
 
Criminal charges need to be laid against the owner of that gun. Improper storage of a fire arm.
How could he be THAT stupid.
 
1) Guy's a dumb ass for bringing a loaded gun to work.
2) Woman's a dumb ass for touching a man's gun.
3) Guy probably planned on robbing the jewelry store after work.
 
Another reason why "just say no" no more works for guns than it works for sex and drugs.

Schools should all require firearm training and safety classes. Basic firearm safety in grammar school, and firearm training and safety in middle and high school.

Ignorance costs lives.
 
weight can not always be a dead giveaway. while its easy to tell if a gun is real by simple examination, i.e. this womanw as an idiot, weight can be deceptive.
the IR gun I used in the Army truck i was in, that had a target shooting gallery and americas army, was modeled after what I assume was a .45, and felt real. If it weren't for the extra buttons on the gun (namingly the button on the back-edge that had to be depressed with your palm holding the gun), and the fact that it didn't have the metal feel (assuming some kind of plastic, and not metal), it could have fooled me. the battery pack may have added weight to it. either way, it felt real in terms of weight.
 
Originally posted by: destrekor
weight can not always be a dead giveaway. while its easy to tell if a gun is real by simple examination, i.e. this womanw as an idiot, weight can be deceptive.
the IR gun I used in the Army truck i was in, that had a target shooting gallery and americas army, was modeled after what I assume was a .45, and felt real. If it weren't for the extra buttons on the gun (namingly the button on the back-edge that had to be depressed with your palm holding the gun), and the fact that it didn't have the metal feel (assuming some kind of plastic, and not metal), it could have fooled me. the battery pack may have added weight to it. either way, it felt real in terms of weight.
Click to expand...

Weight doesn't mean anything, anyway. If you've never handled a gun before, how the heck are you supposed to know how much it weighs?
 
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: destrekor
weight can not always be a dead giveaway. while its easy to tell if a gun is real by simple examination, i.e. this womanw as an idiot, weight can be deceptive.
the IR gun I used in the Army truck i was in, that had a target shooting gallery and americas army, was modeled after what I assume was a .45, and felt real. If it weren't for the extra buttons on the gun (namingly the button on the back-edge that had to be depressed with your palm holding the gun), and the fact that it didn't have the metal feel (assuming some kind of plastic, and not metal), it could have fooled me. the battery pack may have added weight to it. either way, it felt real in terms of weight.
Click to expand...

Weight doesn't mean anything, anyway. If you've never handled a gun before, how the heck are you supposed to know how much it weighs?
Click to expand...

oh i dunno, just the bit where it's not plastic and featherlight would be a dead givaway for most people with 3/4 of a brain...
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Another reason why "just say no" no more works for guns than it works for sex and drugs.

Schools should all require firearm training and safety classes. Basic firearm safety in grammar school, and firearm training and safety in middle and high school.

Ignorance costs lives.
Click to expand...

Ehh, I would say in High School firearms training would be better. But either way, good idea. They could teach that instead of a whole year of Sex Education leanring about every single STI there is in excrutiating detail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top