I don't get how an anarcho-capitalist like Dr. Paul could be the Champion of the Constitution considering that the Constitution was intended to be a tool of centralization.
None of the framers of the Constitution were libertarians by any stretch of the imagination. James Madison, Hamilton, and Washington were classic statists and they were framers of the Constitution. How could Ron Paul be lumped in with Alexander Hamilton?
I'd have to say that Hamilton, Clay, and Lincoln were/are the Eternal Champions of the Constitution because they were the three most exuberantly economically fascist (i.e., "one people, one nation, one leader", unionism, nationalism, mercantilism, bureaucracy, centralism, monarchism) individuals to ever hold public office in the United States.
None of the framers of the Constitution were libertarians by any stretch of the imagination. James Madison, Hamilton, and Washington were classic statists and they were framers of the Constitution. How could Ron Paul be lumped in with Alexander Hamilton?
I'd have to say that Hamilton, Clay, and Lincoln were/are the Eternal Champions of the Constitution because they were the three most exuberantly economically fascist (i.e., "one people, one nation, one leader", unionism, nationalism, mercantilism, bureaucracy, centralism, monarchism) individuals to ever hold public office in the United States.