How constrained would a 7950 be at PCIe 2.0 x1?

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,038
36
86
It seems like PCIe 2.0 x1 would be somewhat the equivalent of using Thunderbolt to communicate to an external box with a video card in it. I'm wondering, has anyone ever done benchmarks on how much of a performance hit one would take doing this?

Chuck

P.S. I spent like 5 minutes looking into this last night, so if I'm wrong on the PCIe 2.0 x1 to Thunderbolt comparison, please correct me!
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
performance would be absolutely horrible. If you look at the video cards designed for 1x, they are very low end, like 5450's and such.
 

willomz

Senior member
Sep 12, 2012
334
0
0
Thunderbolt has plenty of bandwidth.
EDIT: Sorry, not for GPU, not on current specs, but next year we might be getting close.
 
Last edited:

FalseChristian

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
3,322
0
71
How come I upgraded to Z68 and Sandy Bridge and now I'm stuck at PCIe 2.0 x8 when before this I had a shiity E8400 on a low-end Asus P5N-D and I was getting PCIe 2.0 x16 on both cards?
 

AdamK47

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,230
2,850
126
How come I upgraded to Z68 and Sandy Bridge and now I'm stuck at PCIe 2.0 x8 when before this I had a shiity E8400 on a low-end Asus P5N-D and I was getting PCIe 2.0 x16 on both cards?

Sandy Bridge = Controller on the CPU with 16 PCI-E 2.0 lanes.
Core 2 = Controlled by the motherboard.

Sandy Bridge E has 40 PCI-E 3.0 lanes.
 

FalseChristian

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
3,322
0
71
Sandy Bridge = Controller on the CPU with 16 PCI-E 2.0 lanes.
Core 2 = Controlled by the motherboard.

Sandy Bridge E has 40 PCI-E 3.0 lanes.

Thank you for the explanation. How much will this impact gaming performance?
 

kalrith

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2005
6,630
7
81
I had a problem with my 4870 running at PCIe x1 (although I'm not sure if it was 2.0). My 3DVantage scores more than doubled after fixing the problem and running it at x16.