How come we can't shoot garbage into space?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: mjuszczak
Originally posted by: Imyourzero
Originally posted by: RyanSengara
sure if you don't want to have space lanes..

way to go, instead of solving the source of the problem and contaminating the earth with garbage, when we run out of space we should just shoot it into space.

Why not? I mean, if the cost and other logistics could be made feasible, what's wrong with the idea? There's only, oh I dunno, an infinite amount of space out there to accommodate the garbage assuming we couldn't shoot it directly at the sun. I'd say it would take a lot longer to fill the universe with garbage than it will to fill Earth.

Seriously. If we had such a system set up, it shouldn't give people an excuse to be wasteful, but I don't think there is any way we'll ever get EVERYONE to recycle and/or do their part at reducing/eliminating waste. We're a long way off from the government *requiring* everyone to recycle and from every product being made with the foresight of being reusable.

It seems like the easy way out, but the fact is, garbage will continue to accumulate on this planet until we eventually run out of room for garbage, people, buildings, etc. If you can think of a way of "solving the source" that makes sense, I'm all for it.

So the consensus is that it IS possible with our current technology?

sure its possible. but it would cost so damn much it wouldnt be worth it.
 

PottedMeat

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
12,363
475
126
Originally posted by: Born2bwire
Today's landfill is tomorrow's oil field.

heh yeah, why bother mining millions of tons of rock for a small amount of natural resources in the middle of nowhere when you can just mine a landfill full of material that wont take too much work to make ready to use.



 

Babbles

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2001
8,253
14
81
NASA is aalready talking about how there is too much garbage orbiting the Earth and as such it would be pretty dumb to launch what can be potentially yet more orbiting garbage.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Possible? Sure. But we'd then have a problem with air pollution from all the launches.
And it's expensive. The lowest price I could find for launches today is around $1000 per pound. Your bill for trash collection would likely be more than your income.


Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
1. Build Space Elevator
2. Use it to get garbage into space
3. ...
4. Profit
Even then it needs a rocket to get it out of Earth's gravity well.
 

Born2bwire

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2005
9,840
6
71
Originally posted by: PottedMeat
Originally posted by: Born2bwire
Today's landfill is tomorrow's oil field.

heh yeah, why bother mining millions of tons of rock for a small amount of natural resources in the middle of nowhere when you can just mine a landfill full of material that wont take too much work to make ready to use.

Damn straight. Our rapant consumerism and insatiable consumption will help make the US of 150 million years from now the indisputed king of resources. We'll have all the precious metals, oil, gas, copper, iron. All those hippies that want us to recycle do not realize that some of us are actually thinking of the future when we decide to buy a new LCD TV every year.
 

Toastedlightly

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2004
7,214
6
81
Originally posted by: Laminator
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
shoot nuclear waste at the sun ftw

Now that's a bit more risky...;)

once we get a feasible container which could survive an impact from 80 miles up, then do it. Best solution to the waste problem though.. that or shove it back into the earth :) (into a subversion zone)
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,974
140
106
..ya I wana gather up all those discarded computers and monitors and old tv's and microwaves I see on the street corners and chuck em into space.
 

ppdes

Senior member
May 16, 2004
739
0
0
Watch, we do that and then that new plasma-arc gasification technology comes to fruition and all that trash would have been useful.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Originally posted by: Laminator
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
shoot nuclear waste at the sun ftw

Now that's a bit more risky...;)

once we get a feasible container which could survive an impact from 80 miles up, then do it. Best solution to the waste problem though.. that or shove it back into the earth :) (into a subversion zone)
Don't forget to send it to a breeder reactor first to extract as much energy as possible from it. THEN shoot it into the sun, and wait for people to complain about radioactive sunlight, and how we're going to blow up the sun.
 

Born2bwire

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2005
9,840
6
71

patentman

Golden Member
Apr 8, 2005
1,035
1
0
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
How come we can't shoot garbage into space?

We can. We have the technology to do it... The problem is that it's just a wee bit cost-prohibitive.

that and delivery systems are only 98-99% reliable. Assuming our biggest boosters can carry something like 20tons into space, we'd have hundreds of flights a day to clear the earth of trash. Now say anywhere from 2-8 rockets would blow up a day splattering the earth's populace with human waste.


A literal sh!tstorm, if you will
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,758
603
126
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
How come we can't shoot garbage into space?

We can. We have the technology to do it... The problem is that it's just a wee bit cost-prohibitive.

that and delivery systems are only 98-99% reliable. Assuming our biggest boosters can carry something like 20tons into space, we'd have hundreds of flights a day to clear the earth of trash. Now say anywhere from 2-8 rockets would blow up a day splattering the earth's populace with human waste.

Good idea. Lest spend trillions to splatter everyone with week old chicken bones.

To be fair, you could run the flights over the ocean so when that happened it would be unlikely to hit people. And since lots of crap gets dumped in the ocean anyway it'd still probably be a net plus for the ocean.

The real answer to this question has already been said...escaping earth's gravity is expensive.

The trash could be hurled by a giant railgun running off a nuclear power source to solve that problem though.