How come Columbine had much more media attention?

bladder23

Banned
Jun 28, 2007
564
0
0
How come columbine is so popular with media when shootings at like virginia tech

Virginia tech had 33 people dead vs 15 at columbine
 

OREOSpeedwagon

Diamond Member
May 30, 2001
8,485
1
81
The VT shooting was pretty big in the news here. IIRC the Columbine shooting was one of the first ones (seems like there was an Arkansas one shortly before it? can't remember). And there were a ton of details, everyone wanted to know what caused it, people started wondering if Doom on the N64 caused it, etc
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,568
3
0
Columbine was one of the first. Similar shootings no longer make enough money for the media to spend as much time on them.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,459
854
126
Originally posted by: Steve
Also because of the kids (shooters) making that website about it and such.

They were also in high school and too young to legally own such guns so there was that aspect as well.
 

Cuda1447

Lifer
Jul 26, 2002
11,757
0
71
I'm gonna go with one of the first ones to occur. Its common nowadays, unfortunately.
 

Farang

Lifer
Jul 7, 2003
10,914
3
0
The video game and planning aspects. Grenades and assault rifles versus some asshole with a pistol. Also younger victims. VT got a ton of attention, though.
 

imported_Imp

Diamond Member
Dec 20, 2005
9,148
0
0
It's been done over and over and over again. Didn't we just have one last week? Anyhow, I hope the shooter rots in hell. Loser couldn't just kill himself and leave happy people alone.
 

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
Originally posted by: irishScott
Columbine was one of the first. Similar shootings no longer make enough money for the media to spend as much time on them.

It was #20.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_shooting

I think a good deal of it being publicized so much was that it was a rich area, it was well planned, and it was bloody. The others before it didn't have all three of those characteristics.
 

bladder23

Banned
Jun 28, 2007
564
0
0
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: irishScott
Columbine was one of the first. Similar shootings no longer make enough money for the media to spend as much time on them.

It was #20.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_shooting

I think a good deal of it being publicized so much was that it was a rich area, it was well planned, and it was bloody. The others before it didn't have all three of those characteristics.

you could argue that VT was well-planned as well

The shooter took out 32 by himself with locks/chains on doors etc
 
S

SlitheryDee

The first was the guy in the bell tower. Columbine was the first major one in our lifetime. As in all things the "school shooting" has become part of humanity's constant trend of oneupsmanship. It'll escalate until it is no longer new and horrible and then it will fade away, to be replaced by another new or forgotten atrocity.
 

krunchykrome

Lifer
Dec 28, 2003
13,413
1
0
Because that was the start of these school shootings in recent memory. We've become desensitized to things like this.
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,923
0
0
A quick check of news.bbc.co.uk reveals thatthere were FIVE school shootings this week. The front page has an article on one and mentions that there have been four others this week
 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,408
39
91
Originally posted by: Imp
It's been done over and over and over again. Didn't we just have one last week? Anyhow, I hope the shooter rots in hell. Loser couldn't just kill himself and leave happy people alone.

Your attitude is a large part in why there are so many of these school shootings.

While these school shootings are nothing short of a tragic event, these kids that engage in these shootings does not exactly grow up in an environment that shows any empathy or nurturing at all, but rather immense apathy and intolerance.

Now while this obviously doesn't justify their actions, but what it does is build a lot of hate in these kids. These kids are obviously suicidal kids because they feel so miserable. And when they feel that the root of the misery stems from all the apathy that they get from the society around them, it'd be nothing short of an ultimate fantasy to for them to take a few automatic weapons and shoot them up.

 

Epic Fail

Diamond Member
May 10, 2005
6,252
2
0
There were videos of shooting inside the school and kids being pull out of windows, definitely more dramatic.