I just graduated with a JD and am studying for the bar right now (actually I'm not, which is why this has to be my last post so I don't fail) and I have some familiarity with the topic.
Anyway, I agree that it is possible blacks get harsher sentencing. BUT I would have to see an apples to apples comparison. Often, these figures are compiled by those trying to prove a point and leave out such important facts as repeat offenders, probationary status, or degrees of the individual crimes where applicable.
I took a class called White Collar Crime in law school. The professor provided us with a govt prepared chart presenting figures on imprisonment and for what crimes the imprisionment was for, broken down by race and gender. Also, the professor was a black woman, so there was no hokey pokey going on with the selection of the chart.
Basically, blacks are more likely to commit violent crimes which are much more disfavored by society and therefore carry harsher sentences. That has always been true (the harsher sentencing that is) - people just want to feel that their bodies will be safe. The charts we were presented with actually indicated hispanics as the most imprisioned group and some categories with whites as the majority class. It all depends on the crime.
If whites commit more crimes that carry less harsh sentencing what can we do? We can't ask whites to begin committing more violent crimes just to equalize statistics, can we? Should we impose harsher sentencing on these crimes traditionally held to be less serious than violent crimes, if so, why and with what justification?
As far as DNA evd. freeing people, I believe that when blacks are freed it is just given more attention. CNN and the NY Times are well known as liberally slanted. Just because black people are freed by DNA evidence doesn't mean that white people are not. Again, we are never given an apples to apples comparison.
(I have got to turn off my computer and study now, thanks for the interesting discussion)[/quote]
I agree this is very apples to apples comparison, but there is evidence of biased decisions that have been documented with in the lat 40 years, remember that blacks were not given much justice until after Martin Luther King and other organizations that were just fed up with disparities. However it?s harder to prove judges or juries intent.
Another point to bring up is that economically whites hit harder than any other group, since many commit crimes of money laundering bank fraud, stock insider trading etc. So for the most part people who are laid off because of company collapse and so forth, or loose their pensions, or retirement or life savings you can thank corporate greed, and that 90% who run big business.