Again calling on Constitutional scholars here. If I judge says what you are doing is illegal and unconstitutional. How can you get away with continuing to do it until your appeals have been exhausted? I would think you would have to stop until the decision was reversed. I mean that's like me saying 'judge, I know you said stealing was against the law, but I going to keep stealing until my appeals are finished.' Does the administration get charges with crimes for any wiretaps done after the judges ruling if it is not overturned?
Someone explain.
Someone explain.