I'm reminded of the words of Jack Handey:
I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.
By the time we're ready to colonize another planet hopefully we would have progressed socially to the point where we come from a mindset of tolerance and understanding instead of dominance.
Your entire proposition depends upon our past behavior. We have steadily made progress towards being more open-minded and tolerant(western cultures at least). To make any projections a hundred years down the road you have to take social change into account. Currently we live in fear of the unknown which makes us act aggressive. In the future hopefully we will not live in fear, but through understanding which makes us more tolerant.
There is of course the possibility that we crash and burn under our own hubris before we do anything meaningful in space.
Personally, I am OK if we don't come in peace.The human race's goal is obviously to colonize another planet.
We are a species that specializes in using and abusing resources.
How do we as a human race, like to fool ourselves in to thinking that if we were to find a new planet, habitable by our race, that has a small population of a species, that we would 'come in peace'?
we would go in there and eliminate them so as to allow us to harvest all valuable resources and inhabit the planet.
do we just LOVE lying?
(like Dems, Repubs, Libs, etc.)
Moved from P&N. Not sure how this is politics or news. -Admin DrPizza
If we encounter other life and we are technologically superior to them, our motives for being at their planet are more likely to be exploration, curiosity, etc than resource seeking. It could be both, of course.
I don't think we'll ever get to that point. I wish we would, I used to think so... but the more I observe demographic and societal trends on this planet, the more I think our future will be more like Idiocracy than Avatar.
I wouldn't be surprised if humans never set foot on another world again.
Sounds like someone watched the caricatures in Avatar and thinks it really does describe humans.
Humans are probably the only creatures on this planet that can comprehend enough to actually care about the environment at all.
Animals are not as noble as OP seems to think. They would surely exploit any advantage or resource until it was exhausted.
I think you get my point.
you really need me to define this?
we use WATER, the most important thing on earth, to DISPOSE of CHEMICALS.
we take resources and don't replace them.
Sounds like someone watched the caricatures in Avatar and thinks it really does describe humans.
Humans are probably the only creatures on this planet that can comprehend enough to actually care about the environment at all.
Animals are not as noble as OP seems to think. They would surely exploit any advantage or resource until it was exhausted.
We are aware, but we don't care, because money comes first.
Look at all the damage we are doing to our planet. We are aware of it, but nobody wants to change it, it all revolves around money, greed, etc.
We are smart... yet stupid, at the same time. We set artificial limitations on our capabilities.
par·a·site
/ˈparəˌsīt/
Noun
An organism that lives in or on another organism (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the host's expense.
Human, animal, or alien...how does ANYTHING thrive on a rock in space without consuming resources?