How can neocons contiunue to blame clinton for everything...

[Vadatajs]

... when Bush Aids Block Clinton's Papers from 9/11 Panel ?

WASHINGTON, April 1 ? The commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks said on Thursday that it was pressing the White House to explain why the Bush administration had blocked thousands of pages of classified foreign policy and counterterrorism documents from former President Bill Clinton's White House files from being turned over to the panel's investigators.

Advertisement

The White House confirmed on Thursday that it had withheld a variety of classified documents from Mr. Clinton's files that had been gathered by the National Archives over the last two years in response to requests from the commission, which is investigating intelligence and law enforcement failures before the attacks.

...

Mr. Lindsey, who is Mr. Clinton's liaison to the National Archives, said he was surprised to discover from the archives in later months that the Bush administration, after reviewing the Clinton documents gathered by researchers there, had decided not to turn over most of the material.

He said he had read through many of the 10,800 pages that were collected and believed them to be valuable to the work of the panel.

"They involved all of the issues ? Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, terrorism, all of the areas with the commission's jurisdiction," he said. He made his first public complaints about the handling of the documents in an interview with The Associated Press on Wednesday.

This smells really fishy. They obviously have something to hide. Be it ineptitude or malice, they need to come clean.

 

[MonstaThrilla]

Originally posted by: Vadatajs
This smells really fishy. They obviously have something to hide. Be it ineptitude or malice, they need to come clean.

That's like asking Bill Clinton to not get a BJ from his intern. Ain't gonna happen. Too bad with them it affects all of us and not just Monica's blue dress.

(irony intentional)

 

[Red Dawn]

It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

 

[LordJezo]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

 

[Vadatajs]

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

Too bad Clinton's economy also has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 panel.

 

[MonstaThrilla]

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

But they will forever be known as the "Clinton Years", when all the American public worried about was OJ Simpson and how terrible Limp Bizkit was.

 

[LordJezo]

Originally posted by: Vadatajs

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

Too bad Clinton's economy also has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 panel.

Naa... but maybe it was the Clinton administration that had something to do with the bombing of two us embassies and the bombing of a us warship and the failure to get Osama when they had the chance.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Vadatajs

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

Too bad Clinton's economy also has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 panel.

Naa... but maybe it was the Clinton administration that had something to do with the bombing of two us embassies and the bombing of a us warship and the failure to get Osama when they had the chance.

What did they have to do with those Bombings LordTroll? You think they were planning them along with Bin Laden?

 

[SuperTool]

Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

But they will forever be known as the "Clinton Years", when all the American public worried about was OJ Simpson and how terrible Limp Bizkit was.

Yep the good olde days. Time of such optimism. Maybe just for me.
I came here in 1993 at the beginning of Clinton years with nothing, and in winter of 2000, I got my engineering degree. So for me the end of Clinton years coincided with the end of my school years, and the beginning of Bush years corresponded with the beginning of my work years. You can see why I hate Bush now

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Vadatajs

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

Too bad Clinton's economy also has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 panel.

Naa... but maybe it was the Clinton administration that had something to do with the bombing of two us embassies and the bombing of a us warship and the failure to get Osama when they had the chance.

If the Terrorists are so thrilled to have Bush in Office then why did go through with their Mission on 9-11???

 

[MonstaThrilla]

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Vadatajs

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

Too bad Clinton's economy also has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 panel.

Naa... but maybe it was the Clinton administration that had something to do with the bombing of two us embassies and the bombing of a us warship and the failure to get Osama when they had the chance.

Just as the Bush administration has something to do with 9/11 and the failure to get Osama when Tenet had his "hair on fire" over it.

 

[LordJezo]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Vadatajs

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

Too bad Clinton's economy also has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 panel.

Naa... but maybe it was the Clinton administration that had something to do with the bombing of two us embassies and the bombing of a us warship and the failure to get Osama when they had the chance.

If the Terrorists are so thrilled to have Bush in Office then why did go through with their Mission on 9-11???

Clark-sama said it himself... nothing could have been done to prevent 9/11 by the time people knew what was going on. He also said that even if every single suggestion he had made was enacted 9/11 would have still occured.

 

[ElFenix]

how come every thread in this forum is exactly the same?

 

[stateofbeasley]

That's what I was thinking. It all disolves into elementary school name-calling and insults.

Originally posted by: ElFenix
how come every thread in this forum is exactly the same?

 

[maddogchen]

Originally posted by: stateofbeasley
That's what I was thinking. It all disolves into elementary school name-calling and insults.

Originally posted by: ElFenix
how come every thread in this forum is exactly the same?

Isn't that what Politics is? Take anything, split it among party lines, yell at each other, put up stats, when nothing left to say proceed to name-calling and insults.

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: maddogchen

Originally posted by: stateofbeasley
That's what I was thinking. It all disolves into elementary school name-calling and insults.

Originally posted by: ElFenix
how come every thread in this forum is exactly the same?

Isn't that what Politics is? Take anything, split it among party lines, yell at each other, put up stats, when nothing left to say proceed to name-calling and insults.

But they are so good at it.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: Vadatajs
... when Bush Aids Block Clinton's Papers from 9/11 Panel ?

WASHINGTON, April 1 ? The commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks said on Thursday that it was pressing the White House to explain why the Bush administration had blocked thousands of pages of classified foreign policy and counterterrorism documents from former President Bill Clinton's White House files from being turned over to the panel's investigators.

Advertisement

The White House confirmed on Thursday that it had withheld a variety of classified documents from Mr. Clinton's files that had been gathered by the National Archives over the last two years in response to requests from the commission, which is investigating intelligence and law enforcement failures before the attacks.

...

Mr. Lindsey, who is Mr. Clinton's liaison to the National Archives, said he was surprised to discover from the archives in later months that the Bush administration, after reviewing the Clinton documents gathered by researchers there, had decided not to turn over most of the material.

He said he had read through many of the 10,800 pages that were collected and believed them to be valuable to the work of the panel.

"They involved all of the issues ? Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, terrorism, all of the areas with the commission's jurisdiction," he said. He made his first public complaints about the handling of the documents in an interview with The Associated Press on Wednesday.

This smells really fishy. They obviously have something to hide. Be it ineptitude or malice, they need to come clean.

More of the same from the most corrupt White House since Nixon (at least).

 

[Vadatajs]

They've decided to release them after all; there's another thread on it around here somewhere. This was still a very suspiciosus act on their part though.

 

[josphII]

Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla

Originally posted by: LordJezo

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
It's a way to detract from the memory of a good economy and much better times for Americans compared to America under the Dub.

Too bad the economy had nothing much to do with him and instead had lots to do with the tech boom.

But they will forever be known as the "Clinton Years", when all the American public worried about was OJ Simpson and how terrible Limp Bizkit was.

amongst who?

 

[josphII]

Originally posted by: ElFenix
how come every thread in this forum is exactly the same?

because the democrats see a conspiracy in everything

 

[datalink7]

Originally posted by: josphII

Originally posted by: ElFenix
how come every thread in this forum is exactly the same?

because the democrats see a conspiracy in everything

^
|
|
|

Case in point?

 

[maluckey]

In response to the original question at the top..............

Why is everything Bushes fault? Too many on these forums see only in Black and white. Some only see the black, others only white. We all likely hate the ones seeing only white though. I have always felt the truth to be many shades of grey.

Art lesson over.....


Mark.

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: maluckey
In response to the original question at the top..............

Why is everything Bushes fault? Too many on these forums see only in Black and white. Some only see the black, others only white. We all likely hate the ones seeing only white though. I have always felt the truth to be many shades of grey.

Art lesson over.....


Mark.

I was about to ask the same thing. Why to liberals blame everything on Bush?

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: maluckey
In response to the original question at the top..............

Why is everything Bushes fault? Too many on these forums see only in Black and white. Some only see the black, others only white. We all likely hate the ones seeing only white though. I have always felt the truth to be many shades of grey.

Art lesson over.....


Mark.

I was about to ask the same thing. Why to liberals blame everything on Bush?