- Feb 13, 2003
- 26,256
- 406
- 126
With the recent spike in Opterons and overall very low availibility, I probably waited too long and I'm not sure if I should pay the premium for an overclock that may only be very slightly better. The 146s are $210 minimum for retail and 144s are $170 min. for retail. From the Opty o/c thread, it seems like the average 144 overclock is 2500mhz for stock fan, and for 146 is 2800mhz. Yet people talk of regular A64 Venice or Sandys at 2.5ghz+ overclocks.
Any sort of opinions on comparison of the overclocks? I know that 99% sure the Venice will not reach as high, but if its within say 200mhz but was much cheaper, that's clearly the better value. Plus I don't think the extra L2 cache really matters in what I need my comp for most: games.
So, go for an Opty still or get a Venice for a mild overclock? What speed Venice is best for value and overclocking?
Plus if I was only doing a mild Venice overclock, I could get the EVGA mobo (not a heavy overclocker, but decent enough) and save more money there with not needing an expensive mobo.
Any sort of opinions on comparison of the overclocks? I know that 99% sure the Venice will not reach as high, but if its within say 200mhz but was much cheaper, that's clearly the better value. Plus I don't think the extra L2 cache really matters in what I need my comp for most: games.
So, go for an Opty still or get a Venice for a mild overclock? What speed Venice is best for value and overclocking?
Plus if I was only doing a mild Venice overclock, I could get the EVGA mobo (not a heavy overclocker, but decent enough) and save more money there with not needing an expensive mobo.