Originally posted by: Stunt
actually they are all temporary jobs and manufacturing jobs did not go up.
oh, and this is below expectations, and nowhere near the level during clinton rule.
unemployment was 3.8% when he left.
None-the-less better than more negative numbers
HOP for once is correct. Just like Clinton had little to do with creating jobs during his reign the same is true for the Dub.Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Stunt
actually they are all temporary jobs and manufacturing jobs did not go up.
oh, and this is below expectations, and nowhere near the level during clinton rule.
unemployment was 3.8% when he left.
None-the-less better than more negative numbers
Replace "clinton rule" with "dot com bubble" and you've got it right, but those jobs were "temporary" too, now weren't they?
Originally posted by: alchemize
Repost
Stunt = Dave? Nah, even dumber. Maybe a troll instead.
1) The numbers were FAR above expectations
2) These were broad based, across all industries.
3) 21,000 were in manufacturing
Oh commmmme on...None-the-less better than more negative numbers
Originally posted by: Stunt
1)expectations were in the 300,000's
2)almost all temporary jobs
3)10% manufacturing after a massive slump in munufacturing jobs
off to get some data, saw it on robtv today
oh and i didnt realize that tech jobs=manufacturing...that's news to me!
oh wait not they arent!....silly.
Originally posted by: bjc112
Originally posted by: Stunt
1)expectations were in the 300,000's
2)almost all temporary jobs
3)10% manufacturing after a massive slump in munufacturing jobs
off to get some data, saw it on robtv today
oh and i didnt realize that tech jobs=manufacturing...that's news to me!
oh wait not they arent!....silly.
Expectations were not 300K
It was 170,000's i believe...
Even last months report was revised upwards.. from 308, to 337,000..
Do whatever you want to do, its tough to spin REALLY good news..
Originally posted by: Stunt
1)expectations were in the 300,000's
2)almost all temporary jobs
3)10% manufacturing after a massive slump in munufacturing jobs
off to get some data, saw it on robtv today
oh and i didnt realize that tech jobs=manufacturing...that's news to me!
oh wait not they arent!....silly.
Originally posted by: Stunt
1)expectations were in the 300,000's
2)almost all temporary jobs
3)10% manufacturing after a massive slump in munufacturing jobs
off to get some data, saw it on robtv today
oh and i didnt realize that tech jobs=manufacturing...that's news to me!
oh wait not they arent!....silly.
Payrolls grew by 288,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department reported, well above the 173,000 economists had forecast, according to a survey by Reuters. The number even topped the highest forecasts of about 250,000.
Even the manufacturing sector added 21,000 jobs last month after shedding jobs for 42 straight months -- until a revision showed a gain in the sector each of the last three months.
Within employment services, temporary help services added 35,000 jobs in April and 261,000 over the year.
But Gene Sperling, economic adviser to Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, said that the strong April report did not make up for job losses earlier in the Bush administration.
"We're in a very deep hole on job market," Sperling said on the same program. "We've had a couple of steps in the right direction, but we have a lot farther to dig ourselves out."
Originally posted by: leeboy
104,000 of the new jobs were Administrative & Waste Management of which 60,100 were Employment services and 7,700 in management/technical consulting (all contractors).
36,000 were McJobs in the Leisure/Hospitality sector of which a 41,000 increase in the Food retail sector were offset by a loss in other leisure activities.
23,400 were Retail of which 10,400 were Building material/garden supply stores (Lowe's, Home Depot)
18,000 were in Construction (of which the 19,800 in Specialty contractors were offset by a 2,700 decline in building construction jobs).
It is interesting to note that there were the following decreases:
1,700 loss in telecomm
3,900 loss in computer systems design
clap clap clap
:roll:
Someone has to rain on the parade this week, my turn![]()
On a serious note, does anyone think that anything that happens (in the job market) by November is going to swing this campain one way or the other? I sure don't. When 300,000 jobs a month were promised by Bush himself after his tax cuts took effect July of last year, he is falling flat on his face. Only happened 1x since July. I think either you are of the belief the economy is sh!t right now or you don't. There is no swing vote there.
On a serious note, does anyone think that anything that happens (in the job market) by November is going to swing this campain one way or the other? I sure don't. When 300,000 jobs a month were promised by Bush himself after his tax cuts took effect July of last year, he is falling flat on his face.
Originally posted by: Genesys
Originally posted by: Stunt
1)expectations were in the 300,000's
2)almost all temporary jobs
3)10% manufacturing after a massive slump in munufacturing jobs
off to get some data, saw it on robtv today
oh and i didnt realize that tech jobs=manufacturing...that's news to me!
oh wait not they arent!....silly.
dude, where have you been? manufacturing in the US is on the way out, so dont expect there to be phenominal job increases in the manufacturing sector. the face of our economy is changing, we dont manufacture as many goods as we once did.
Originally posted by: Stunt
My original point was to compare the economic outlook between when bush took the helm and now.
Jobs
from this chart we see that unemployment is up from 3.8% to 5.x%.
the next chart is pretty useless but bring your attention to the negative change in job numbers ONLY with bush in the last 12 years.
i'd also like to address the last chart which shows the unemployment claims down while unemployment doesn't move. Now either the bush admin are more efficient in distributing welfare, or they are kicking more people off it.
Hours
from this chart you can see the huge decline in work hours done by workers per week.
also not only were manufacturing jobs axed during his term, but between clinton and now they are working less hours and less overtime
Imports
Ah the import chart, every stong economy imports all their goods...oh wait no they dont, jeez that can't be a good thing.
Loans
It's ok because the US consumer is spending money!...oh wait, not their money, they spend on credit and loans!...look at that graph go, at least the companies have some sense to not go on spending spees on borrowed money. Shoot interest rate hikes are not going to be fun for you guys
Confidence
well it's all good as long as confidence is high, looking at this graph it has declined a lot since bush took over, but it is going up, see how that is as people get more in debt with interest rates rising.
Spending
one last graph, spending way more than you earn is good fiscal sense right? :S
And that my friends is the US economy, haven't even touched deficits, and money pit called iraq and afganistan
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Bush took office, when the economy was in a recession and the dot com was imploding. ~8months later, several industries were gutted by 9/11. The economy is more than on a rebound. As for manufacturing job losses, there were large steady manufacturing layoffs since the 1980s. This is NOT a new trend, and dont expect to see huge manufacturing employment gains unless there is a WWIII. IIRC we are already at record manufacturing output, we dont need more people to do less work. And we dont need more people for more manufacturing output if there arent any buyers(trade defiect is still horribly disproportionate).
Bush took office, when the economy was in a recession and the dot com was imploding. ~8months later, several industries were gutted by 9/11. The economy is more than on a rebound. As for manufacturing job losses, there were large steady manufacturing layoffs since the 1980s. This is NOT a new trend, and dont expect to see huge manufacturing employment gains unless there is a WWIII. IIRC we are already at record manufacturing output, we dont need more people to do less work. And we dont need more people for more manufacturing output if there arent any buyers(trade defiect is still horribly disproportionate).
