2018 2nd quarer GDP numbers in 4.1%
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/27/us-markets-bumper-earnings-gdp-data-in-focus.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/27/us-markets-bumper-earnings-gdp-data-in-focus.html
One of the big problems we still have is participation. In 2008 we averaged right around 66%. Today we are at about 63%.
How much of that is attributed to boomer retirement? I think they are bailing faster than workers are replacing.
In the long shadow of the recession, the share of the population in the work force sunk to 62.4 percent in September, the lowest level in nearly 40 years. The government calculates that number by counting the people who have a job or are actively looking for one. That means students, retirees and stay-at-home parents are generally not considered part of the labor force.
Actually, the main reason the labor force participation rate (LFPR) has fallen has been a drop in the LFPR among prime age workers (ages 25–54). This peaked in 2000 at 82.8 percent in early 2000. In September of 2015 it bottomed out at 79.2 percent, 3.6 percentage points below its 2000 peak. The drop in LFPR in the recession and weak recovery has been primarily a story of workers in their prime working years leaving the labor force, not baby boomers retiring or young people staying in school longer.
Although the 25-to-54-year-old group shows the strongest attachment to the labor market, its participation rate has been gradually declining since 2000 and is expected to change little over the coming decade. The participation rates of both 16-to-19-year-olds and 20-to-24-year-olds have decreased sharply over the past several decades. Their rates are expected to decline further, although at a slower rate.
The participation rates for teenagers and young adults. With increased school enrollment at all levels, especially the secondary and college levels, more young people than ever before are continuing their education in hopes of getting better paying jobs in the future. The participation rates of both 16-to-19-year-olds and 20-to-24-year-olds have decreased sharply over the past several decades. Their rates are expected to decline further, although at a slower rate.
Changing participation rates by gender. The participation rate of women peaked in 1999 after a half century of rapid growth. However, since 1999, their participation rate has trended down and is projected to continue trending downward. The labor force participation rate for men has been declining since the 1940s. This trend is expected to continue to 2026 as well.
Trump once said jobs numbers are fake. Maybe that was under the Negro’s administration?
Still rolling along but some concerns out there, specifically, the slow down in global trade. This can very often signal a recession incoming as it did in both 2000 and 2008.Economy adds more jobs than expected in August, and wage growth hits post-recession high
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/07/us-nonfarm-payrolls-aug-2018.html
Quoted for emphasis.
THIS is the real story here.
The employment trends started under Obama have not changed.
![]()
Trump is using the same unemployment statistics from the same agencies Obama used. Yet he called the numbers under Obama "Fake." As did all of the GOP.
Go ahead, prove that it isnt a trend line based on Obama's economy.More good news and more progressive assholes lying about good news because it's due to President Trump's political actions.
Don't worry, the Fed is about to take care of thatThis is good. Finally seeing some decent wage growth.
This is good. Finally seeing some decent wage growth.
I’m a bit ignorant in this area. What’s the Fed going to do besides raise interest rates?Don't worry, the Fed is about to take care of that
I’m a bit ignorant in this area. What’s the Fed going to do besides raise interest rates?
Or will the rising interest rates eat up any minimal wage growth?
Yeah...it sucks that we have to pay the price for all that Quantitative Easing under Obama. But don't worry, Trump's fiscal policy is working like a champ.Don't worry, the Fed is about to take care of that
Every minute.Yeah...it sucks that we have to pay the price for all that Quantitative Easing under Obama. But don't worry, Trump's fiscal policy is working like a champ.
But don't worry, Trump's fiscal policy is working like a champ.
![]()
Yup, working like a champ.
